ArticleNeuropsychiatric disease and treatment2026
Sertraline for the Treatment of Major Depressive Disorder in the US: Effectiveness and Acceptability in Real-World Practice.
Article in Neuropsychiatric disease and treatment, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Major depressive disorder (MDD) is a serious mental illness and leading cause of disability. MDD is highly comorbid with physical illnesses such as cardiovascular disease (CVD) and diabetes mellitus (DM). Sertraline, a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor, is proven effective and well-tolerated in clinical trials, and is recommended among first-line treatment options for MDD. Methods: This study explored the effectiveness and acceptability of sertraline in real-world clinical practice, utilizing electronic health record-derived, de-identified data from NeuroBlu Data in the USA. All-cause sertraline discontinuation was the main outcome, with change in Clinical Global Impressions Severity (CGI-S) serving as a secondary outcome. Results: All-cause discontinuation was assessed in 2948 patients treated with sertraline for MDD (702 comorbid with CVD and 280 with DM). The cumulative discontinuation rates at 2- and 3-month follow-up time points were 16.9% and 24.8%, respectively. No significant differences were observed between males and females or those with and without CVD or DM. Change in CGI-S was assessed in 713 patients who had data for one or more follow-up assessments conducted between 2 to 24 months after sertraline prescription. About 9% to 17% of patients demonstrated clinically Conclusion: This study demonstrates that all-cause discontinuation rates in routine practice were consistent with clinical trials indicating comparable sertraline treatment acceptability. The findings add to the body of evidence on real-world effectiveness and clinical utility of sertraline in patients with MDD with or without comorbid chronic medical illnesses like CVD and DM.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.