Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41858420›Full record

ArticleStructural heart : the journal of the Heart Team2026

Different Types of Aortic Valve Stenosis in Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.

Kimberley I Hemelrijk, Hugo M Aarts, Gijs M Broeze, Antonio Gomez Menchero, Didier Tchétché, Fabio S de Brito, Marco Barbanti, Ran Kornowski, Azeem Latib, Augusto D'Onofrio and 15 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Structural heart : the journal of the Heart Team, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Beyond Gradient, Beyond Flow: Rethinking Risk Stratification in Aortic Stenosis.Structural heart : the journal of the Heart Team · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

25 authors.

Kimberley I HemelrijkDepartment of Cardiology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Hugo M AartsDepartment of Cardiology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Gijs M BroezeDepartment of Cardiology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Antonio Gomez MencheroCardiology Department, Hospital Universitario Juan Romón Jiménez, Huelva, Spain.
Didier TchétchéDepartment of Cardiology, Clinique Pasteur, Toulouse, France.
Fabio S de BritoHeart Institute, University of São Paulo Medical School, São Paulo, Brazil.
Marco BarbantiFacoltà di Medicina e Chirurgia, Università degli Studi di Enna "Kore", Enna, Italy.
Ran KornowskiCardiology Department, Rabin Medical Center, Petach Tikva, Israel.
Azeem LatibDepartment of Cardiology, Montefiore Medical Center, New York, New York, USA.
Augusto D'OnofrioDivision of Cardiac Surgery, University of Padova, Padua, Italy.
Flavio RibichiniDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Miguel Artaiz UrdaciDepartment of Cardiology and Cardiac Surgery, Clinica Universitaria de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain.
Nicolas DumonteilDepartment of Cardiology, Clinique Pasteur, Toulouse, France.
Alexandre AbizaidHeart Institute, University of São Paulo Medical School, São Paulo, Brazil.
Samantha SartoriThe Zena and Michael A. Wiener Cardiovascular Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA.
Stefano RosatoGlobal Health Department, Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Rome, Italy.
Giuseppe TarantiniDivision of Cardiac Surgery, University of Padova, Padua, Italy.
Gabriele PesariniDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Katia OrvinCardiology Department, Rabin Medical Center, Petach Tikva, Israel.
Matteo PagnesiInstitute of Cardiology, ASST Spedali Civili, Department of Medical and Surgical Specialties, Radiological Sciences and Public Health, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy.
Beatriz VaquerizoCardiology Department, Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain.
George DangasThe Zena and Michael A. Wiener Cardiovascular Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA.
Roxana MehranThe Zena and Michael A. Wiener Cardiovascular Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA.
Astrid C van NieuwkerkDepartment of Cardiology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Ronak DelewiDepartment of Cardiology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is an effective treatment in patients with "classical" concordant high-gradient aortic stenosis (AS). However, data on outcomes in patients with discordant AS are scarce. Our study aims to investigate the clinical outcomes of patients undergoing TAVR with different types of AS. Methods: The Cerebrovascular Events in Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation 2 (CENTER2) study is a patient-level database including 25,771 patients who underwent TAVR, of whom 15,233 were included in this analysis. Four AS subgroups were identified, and patients were classified as discordant AS (low-gradient AS with preserved or impaired left ventricular ejection fraction [LVEF] or discordant high-gradient AS) or concordant high-gradient AS. Results: A total of 15,233 patients underwent TAVR. The mean age was 81.5 ± 6.8 years, 56% were women, and Society of Thoracic Surgeons Predicted Risk of Mortality was 4.8% (interquartile range [IQR] 3.0-8.0%). Of these, 2731 (17.9%) patients had low-gradient AS with preserved or impaired LVEF, 138 (0.9%) discordant high-gradient AS, and 12,364 (81.2%) concordant high-gradient AS. There was no difference in 1-year mortality between discordant AS and concordant high-gradient AS (13.1 vs. 11.9%, adjusted hazard ratio 1.19, Conclusions: Nearly 20% of patients undergoing TAVR had discordant AS. One-year mortality was higher in low-gradient AS with impaired LVEF, whereas outcomes were similar among low-gradient with preserved LVEF, discordant high-gradient, and concordant high-gradient AS.

Indexed as

Aortic stenosisLow gradientTAVR

Identifiers

PMID41858420
PMCPMC12996641

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.