ArticleThe Lancet regional health. Southeast Asia2026
Extreme weather and sanitation in Bangladesh: a mixed-methods study of lived experiences of people with disabilities.
Article in The Lancet regional health. Southeast Asia, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Climate change exacerbates weather extremes, damaging sanitation infrastructure and undermining personal hygiene. Disasters disproportionately impact people with disabilities. This study explored how flooding and cyclones affect the sanitation experiences of people with disabilities in Bangladesh. Methods: This mixed-methods study comprised a cross-sectional survey, in-depth interviews, and photovoice. Survey data was collected from 1021 people with disabilities and 909 without disabilities. Purposive sampling selected 28 people with disabilities and 16 caregivers for qualitative data collection. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics, multi-level Poisson regression, and thematic analysis. Findings: People with disabilities had a modestly higher risk of experiencing sanitation damage by cyclones or floods compared to people without disabilities (adjusted risk ratio [aRR] 1.28, 95% CI 1.00-1.63). Among people with disabilities, those in the wealthiest quintile were 88% less likely to experience sanitation facility damage than those in the poorest quintile. Qualitative findings showed that muddy, inaccessible paths caused injuries to people with disabilities and their caregivers. Accessing alternative facilities during flooding was difficult for persons with disabilities, with some experiencing verbal abuse. Some reported resorting to open defecation. People with disabilities with incontinence often could not reach facilities in time, resulting in soiled clothing and bedding. Privacy concerns and reliance on caregivers led many, especially women, to restrict toileting, while both women and men adjusted food and water intake, increasing health risks. Interpretation: Flooding and storms worsen sanitation challenges for people with disabilities and caregivers, increasing injury risk, dependence, and exposure to human waste. Climate-resilient sanitation must prioritise inclusive sanitation to protect dignity, health, and well-being, and prevent the deepening of health inequalities. Funding: Australian Government's Water for Women (WfW) Fund.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.