Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41858348›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2026

Dosimetric comparison of MRI-guided and CT-guided intracavitary and interstitial brachytherapy for locally advanced cervical cancer.

Wencui Yang, Jun Lu, Li Wang, Haiyun Wang, Peng Li, Qi Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Wencui YangDepartment of Radiotherapy, Xi'an International Medical Center Hospital, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China.
Jun LuDepartment of Radiotherapy, Xi'an International Medical Center Hospital, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China.
Li WangDepartment of Radiotherapy, Xi'an International Medical Center Hospital, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China.
Haiyun WangDepartment of Radiotherapy, Xi'an International Medical Center Hospital, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China.
Peng LiDepartment of Radiotherapy, Xi'an International Medical Center Hospital, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China.
Qi ZhangDepartment of Radiotherapy, Xi'an International Medical Center Hospital, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: To compare the differences in dosimetry and toxicities between Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) and Computed Tomography (CT)-guided intracavitary and interstitial implantation for locally advanced cervical cancer, respectively. Methods: We analyzed 40 cases of locally advanced cervical cancer admitted to our hospital from January 2023 to September 2024. Patients underwent CT-guided intracavitary and interstitial implantation followed by MRI scanning. We compared the volume of HR-CTV and IR-CTV, the dosimetric differences of HR-CTV D Results: The mean HR-CTV and IR-CTV volumes were larger using CT guidance compared with MRI guidance (P<0.05), the differences were statistically significant. The HR-CTV D Conclusion: Intracavitary and interstitial implantation under MRI guidance can significantly improve HR-CTV and IR-CTV D

Indexed as

cervical cancerintracavitary and interstitial implantationMRI imagingthree-dimensional brachytherapytumor

Identifiers

PMID41858348
PMCPMC12995612

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.