Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41858319›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in rehabilitation sciences2026

Response inhibition and exercise: from theory to translational practice.

Daisuke Sato

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Daisuke SatoInstitute of Health and Sport Sciences, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Response inhibition (RI), the ability to suppress a prepotent or ongoing action in response to sensory information, is a core control function that supports adaptive behaviour in everyday life, sport, and rehabilitation. Although RI has been widely studied in cognitive neuroscience and clinical research, reviews have rarely focused specifically on how RI relates to physical activity. This Mini Review addresses this gap by integrating three strands: (i) conceptual foundations of RI including neural mechanisms supporting proactive and reactive inhibition, (ii) elite athletes as a model of long-term adaptation, and (iii) exercise-induced modulation of RI. We first outline the distinction between proactive and reactive inhibition and summarise representative behavioural paradigms for their assessment. We then review converging evidence implicating cortico-basal ganglia circuit in stopping, highlighting candidate pathways that may differentially support anticipatory and stimulus-driven control. Building on this mechanistic framework, we discuss athlete research as a natural model for understanding experience-dependent changes in RI, and we summarise evidence that acute exercise can transiently modulate inhibitory performance, with implications for ageing and rehabilitation. By synthesising definitions, neural substrates, adaptive models, and exercise effects, we aim to advance a practical and evaluatable framework for the assessment and targeting of RI in sport, clinical rehabilitation, and daily functioning.

Indexed as

athleteexerciseproactive inhibitionreactive inhibitionresponse inhibition

Identifiers

PMID41858319
PMCPMC12995637

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.