ArticleKidney international reports2026
Prevention of Recurrent Kidney Stones: A CARI Guidelines Summary.
Article in Kidney international reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The incidence of kidney stones is increasing in Australia and Aotearoa New Zealand, increasing pressure on emergency departments for acute pain management and stretching nephrology and dietetics services tasked with preventing recurrence. To address this, the Caring for Australians and New ZealandeRs with kidney Impairment (CARI) guidelines provide evidence-based recommendations that complement urological and surgical care, contextualized for our region and developed with input from people with lived experience. Methods: Guidelines were developed through a 5-stage process aligned with the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. A multidisciplinary working group formulated Population Intervention/Exposure Comparator Outcome Methodology questions, and a group of consumers in a dedicated workshop scoped guideline topics. A systematic literature review was conducted, prioritizing high-quality evidence that was critically appraised and synthesized. Recommendations were drafted using the GRADE Evidence-to-Decision framework, incorporating perspectives of lived experience throughout. Results: These guidelines provide recommendations on the diagnosis, metabolic evaluation, and management to prevent recurrent kidney stones. Nutrition therapy provided by dietitians with expertise is a fundamental and cost-effective intervention for preventing recurrent kidney stones. Although nutrition therapy should precede pharmacological interventions in most cases, the use of potassium citrate and thiazide diuretics may be considered when nutrition therapy alone is insufficient. Conclusion: These CARI guidelines address a critical gap in the management of kidney stones in Australia and New Zealand by providing evidence-based, contextualized recommendations to support nephrologists, dietitians with expertise in kidney stones, and other health professionals in delivering consistent, high-quality care that reduces kidney stone recurrence and improves outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.