Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41858233›Full record

ArticleHealth expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy2026

Tools and Resources for Engaging People With Lived and Living Experience and Caregivers in Mental Health and Substance Use Research: Findings From a Survey and Community Consultation Events.

Lisa D Hawke, Abigail Amartey, Vivien Cappe, Hajar Seiyad, Susan Conway, Joshua Orson, Joshua Dunphy, Sean A Kidd, Natasha Y Sheikhan, Nicole Kozloff and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Meta-Research on the Science of Lived Experience Engagement in Mental Health and Substance Use Health Research: A Scoping Review and Qualitative Synthesis.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Lisa D HawkeCentre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-1108-9453
Abigail AmarteyCentre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Vivien CappeCentre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Hajar SeiyadCentre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Susan ConwayCentre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Joshua OrsonCentre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Joshua DunphyCentre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Sean A KiddCentre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Natasha Y SheikhanCentre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Nicole KozloffCentre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Branka AgicCentre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Lina ChiuccarielloCentre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Connie PuttermanCentre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Melissa HiebertCentre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Funding

CIHR
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere is increasing recognition of the value of engaging people with lived and living experience and caregivers in mental health and substance use health research, in roles such as advisors, collaborators, and co-researchers. While tools and resources are required to support teams in conducting authentic engagement, it is unclear what is most needed by academic researchers and those with lived/living experience. This study aimed to identify the tools and resources most needed by academic researchers, people with lived/living experience, and caregivers to support engagement and to co-design a sample of tools.

methodsWe conducted an online survey with 46 people with lived/living experience and caregivers and 46 academic researchers with engagement experience to identify what tools and resources were available and still needed to support engagement in research. We then held two consultations with 55 of the survey participants (38 lived/living experience and caregiver participants, 17 researcher participants). At the consultations, participants discussed the most highly needed tools to be co-developed. We then conducted a co-design phase of the project.

resultsWhile a wide variety of tools and resources are available to people with lived and living experience and academic researchers, many people do not have access to tools and resources that they would consider useful. Participants gave shape to five potential tools and resources. A Lived/Living Experience and Caregiver Working Group then co-developed three tools-two meeting checklists and a career development tip sheet, which are provided in the Appendices.

conclusionsA wide variety of tools and resources may be helpful to support engagement. Research teams might consider reviewing the tools and resources that they have, sharing them with the broader engagement community, and seeking those potentially useful items that they would like to have but have not yet accessed. Future work is required to collect the tools available and offer them systematically to the engagement community for more effective lived/living experience and caregiver engagement in mental health and substance use health research. PATIENT AND PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: All stages of this study were guided by a Lived/Living Experience and Caregiver Working Group, from grant development to manuscript co-authorship.

Indexed as

CaregiversMental HealthSubstance-Related DisordersAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedResearch PersonnelSurveys and Questionnairesimplementation sciencelived experiencemental healthpatient engagementresearch on researchsubstance use

Identifiers

PMID41858233
PMCPMC13080891

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.