ReviewEuropean heart journal2026
Genetic counselling implementation in dilated cardiomyopathy.
Review in European heart journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
25 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Genetic testing has become an integral part of the diagnostic workup of patients with dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM). While the initial goal of genetic testing was to identify family members at risk, recent advances have now extended their relevance to clinical decision-making. Our knowledge of the genetic architecture of DCM has expanded significantly, promoting a shift from the monogenic dogma towards a broader polygenic spectrum. However, current genetic testing strategies still primarily rely on the model of monogenic inheritance with an incomplete penetrance. Large studies have shown a yield varying from 8% to 36% of genetic testing in patients with DCM, depending on aetiology or family history. Genetic testing is generally warranted for every patient with DCM where genetic results could have an impact on risk stratification, the prognosis or the treatment of the patient, or its family members with an opportunity for reassurance or early disease detection. There are various strategies for genetic testing including broad multigene panels, or more targeted panels limited to specific disease-associated genes. Identified variants are classified by genetic laboratories, where pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants often have actionable clinical implications. It is crucial to interpret these variants in the context of the individual patient considering the phenotype and other contributing factors. When the genetic results are consistent with the patients' broader phenotype, potential clinical implications may include decision for device therapy, recommendations for family screening, and reproductive options. A comprehensive approach to integrate genetic testing in the clinical care of patients with DCM is proposed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.