Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41858065›Full record

ReviewJournal of integrative plant biology2026

Convergence and parallelism in the evolution of plant metabolism.

Federico Scossa, Mustafa Bulut, Thomas Naake, John C D'Auria, Alisdair R Fernie

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of integrative plant biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Convergence and parallelism in the evolution of plant metabolism.Journal of integrative plant biology · 2026
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Federico ScossaMax-Planck Institut für Molekulare Pflanzenphysiologie, Potsdam-Golm, D-14476, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6233-1679
Mustafa BulutLeibniz Institute of Plant Biochemistry, Halle (Saale), 06120, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6038-518X
Thomas NaakePhysikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt (PTB), Braunschweig, 38116, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7917-5580
John C D'AuriaLeibniz Institute of Crop Plant Genetics and Crop Plant Research (IPK) OT Gatersleben, Seeland, 06466, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4865-3938
Alisdair R FernieMax-Planck Institut für Molekulare Pflanzenphysiologie, Potsdam-Golm, D-14476, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9000-335X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Convergence and parallelism are contentious terms in evolutionary biology, but both denote essentially a ubiquitous phenomenon: The occurrence of similar phenotypes, in different evolutionary lineages, in a way that cannot be easily reconducted to descent from a shared ancestor. In this article, we trace the historical definitions of the two terms and the current conceptual frameworks to classify instances of repeated evolution, presenting the limits of these approaches in considering convergence and parallelism as a strict dichotomy rather than as part of a continuum along the spectrum of phenotypic similarity. We then present cases of convergence-broadly defined-from plant domestication and specialized metabolism, with the objective of understanding the intricacies between natural selection, constraints and drift underlying the recurrent appearance of complex traits.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionPlantsDomesticationPhenotypeSelection, Geneticadaptationconvergent evolutiondomesticationmetabolismnatural selectionparallelismplants

Identifiers

PMID41858065
PMCPMC13084218

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.