ArticleThe plant genome2026
Machine learning and multi-omic analysis reveal contrasting recombination landscape of A and C subgenomes of winter oilseed rape.
Article in The plant genome, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Meiotic recombination is essential for generating genetic diversity, driving plant evolution, and enabling crop improvement, yet its uneven distribution across genomes constrains breeding efforts. Here, we investigated the multi-omic landmarks that shape the recombination landscape in Brassica napus by integrating epigenomic, genomic, and transcriptomic data with recombination maps derived from large multiparental rapeseed populations. Predictive machine learning accurately predicted recombination rates and hotspot location using only feature information. Recombination was generally suppressed in centromeres and other repeat-rich, methylated regions and enriched in gene-dense, transcriptionally active domains. Proxies for chromatin configuration-such as DNA methylation, transposable elements, or genes-consistently achieved the highest predictive power with the random forest algorithm. We discovered distinct recombination landscape patterns between subgenomes, with crossovers clustering near subtelomeres in the A subgenome and more evenly spread across the C subgenome. Models trained on A subgenome data outperformed those based on the C subgenome, although combining both subgenomes improved overall accuracy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.