ReviewXenotransplantation
Liver Xenotransplantation: Ethical and Societal Implications.
Review in Xenotransplantation. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The shortage of transplantable livers and high waitlist mortality rates have accelerated the clinical translation of liver xenotransplantation. Recent milestones, including extracorporeal perfusion models and gene-edited pig-to-human transplants in both decedents and living patients, indicate that clinical trials may be imminent. While the ethics of solid organ xenotransplantation generally-such as animal welfare, xenozoonosis, and informed consent-have been debated, the specific implications of liver xenotransplantation remain underexplored. This article examines these unique challenges. We argue that pediatric liver xenotransplantation research might proceed simultaneously with adult research due to high waitlist mortality among infants. In adults, we analyze how liver xenotransplantation intersects with historical controversies regarding patient selection, specifically concerning alcohol-associated liver disease and hepatocellular carcinoma. We explore the ethical risks of a potential dual pathway allocation system that could bifurcate waitlists based on disease etiology, raising concerns regarding distributive justice and the stigmatization of addiction. Finally, we consider whether xenografts might serve as a trial of time for patients currently ineligible for allotransplantation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.