Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41858025›Full record

ReviewXenotransplantation

Liver Xenotransplantation: Ethical and Societal Implications.

Daniel J Hurst, Christopher A Bobier, Luz A Padilla, Anthony Merlocco, Raphael P H Meier

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Xenotransplantation. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Daniel J HurstDepartment of Medical Education and Scholarship, Rowan-Virtua School of Osteopathic Medicine, Stratford, New Jersey, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0592-2592
Christopher A BobierCollege of Medicine, Central Michigan University, Mount Pleasant, Michigan, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4194-4721
Luz A PadillaDepartment of Epidemiology, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA.
Anthony MerloccoLe Bonheur Children's Hospital Center For Bioethics and Health Equity, Memphis, Tennessee, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6228-0229
Raphael P H MeierDepartment of Surgery, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The shortage of transplantable livers and high waitlist mortality rates have accelerated the clinical translation of liver xenotransplantation. Recent milestones, including extracorporeal perfusion models and gene-edited pig-to-human transplants in both decedents and living patients, indicate that clinical trials may be imminent. While the ethics of solid organ xenotransplantation generally-such as animal welfare, xenozoonosis, and informed consent-have been debated, the specific implications of liver xenotransplantation remain underexplored. This article examines these unique challenges. We argue that pediatric liver xenotransplantation research might proceed simultaneously with adult research due to high waitlist mortality among infants. In adults, we analyze how liver xenotransplantation intersects with historical controversies regarding patient selection, specifically concerning alcohol-associated liver disease and hepatocellular carcinoma. We explore the ethical risks of a potential dual pathway allocation system that could bifurcate waitlists based on disease etiology, raising concerns regarding distributive justice and the stigmatization of addiction. Finally, we consider whether xenografts might serve as a trial of time for patients currently ineligible for allotransplantation.

Indexed as

HeterograftsLiver TransplantationTransplantation, HeterologousAnimalsHumansSwineWaiting Listsallocationchimeraethicsliverwaitlistxenotransplantation

Identifiers

PMID41858025
PMCPMC13002998

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.