Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41857862›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2026

Co-STARS: a feasibility evaluation of a co-produced mental health literacy training package to reduce mental health inequities for Black young people in underserved communities - study protocol for a randomised controlled trial with an external pilot, process evaluation and economic analysis.

Balachandran Kumarendran, Elizabeth Cherrington, Siddhartha Bandyopadhyay, Francesca Crowe, Katarzyna Karolina Machaczek, Luke Brown, Niyah Campbell, Gerald Jordan, Megan A Pope, Milan Antonović and 6 more

Abstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Balachandran KumarendranInstitute for Mental Health, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK b.kumarendran@bham.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7786-5932
Elizabeth CherringtonInstitute for Mental Health, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Siddhartha BandyopadhyayDepartment of Economics, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Francesca CroweDepartment of Applied Health Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4026-1726
Katarzyna Karolina MachaczekCentre for Applied Health and Social Care Research (CARe) and Advanced Wellbeing Research Centre (AWRC), Sheffield Hallam University, Sheffield, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5308-2407
Luke BrownInstitute for Mental Health, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Niyah CampbellInstitute for Mental Health, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Gerald JordanSchool of Psychological Science, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Megan A PopeInstitute for Mental Health, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Milan AntonovićInstitute for Mental Health, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6163-2584
Matthew TaylorThe University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Nadia WUniversity of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Ayan MahamudUniversity of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Joht Singh ChandanUniversity of Birmingham College of Medical and Dental Sciences, Birmingham, UK.
Sian Lowri GriffithsUniversity of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Co-STARS youth co-production group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionSevere mental illness such as psychosis is among the most disabling illnesses worldwide, disproportionately affecting minoritised ethnic groups and those in socioeconomic disadvantage. In the UK, people from Black ethnic backgrounds are more likely to experience a first episode of psychosis and to be detained under the Mental Health Act than White British people. There is a clear need for mental health services to improve cultural awareness and understanding of the broader social needs of minoritised groups, as well as the need to improve mental health literacy (MHL) within Black communities to empower individuals to seek timely mental health support. This protocol describes our programme of work which aims to assess the feasibility, acceptability and cost-effectiveness of Co-STARS, which is a co-produced, culturally appropriate tiered training package. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We co-produced a culturally appropriate, place-based, tiered MHL training package (Co-STARS) to deliver within underserved Black communities and via an e-learning package implemented among staff within mental health trusts. The training will be evaluated in stages. First, a pilot cluster randomised controlled trial will assess the feasibility and acceptability (defined as participants' perceptions of the training's relevance, usefulness and delivery) of a lived experience-led MHL training package delivered by Black young people with experience of mental ill health, to underserved communities in Birmingham, UK. Acceptability will be quantified through participation and completion rates and explored qualitatively via focus groups and interviews. Second, a stepped-wedge cluster randomised trial will evaluate the feasibility of an e-learning training programme for mental health professionals. We will embed a process evaluation to explore change mechanisms and identify barriers and enablers for future implementation. Third, we will use realist-informed participatory systems mapping and novel epidemiological analyses to explore downstream effects (ie, improved care access for Black ethno-racial groups within the intervention areas). Last, a cost-effectiveness framework will be developed to assess whether the intervention is good value for money in future efficacy trials. In the cluster trial, eight clusters will be randomised to the intervention arm (face-to-face training in the community) and control arm (display of MHL materials) with pre- and post-assessments in 120 participants from 8 clusters, 3 weeks apart. In the stepped wedge trial, six clusters (clinical teams within NHS mental health trusts) including 120 NHS staff in total, will move from control phase to intervention phase in a stepped wedge manner, with pre-assessments and post-assessments. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This proposal was reviewed by the Research Governance of the University of Birmingham and UK Research and Innovation (UKRI) grant reviewers. Ethics approval was granted by East of Scotland Research Ethics Service. The findings will be communicated in research conferences, stakeholder meetings, via social media, through publication in peer-reviewed journals and as a policy document. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN10517405.

Indexed as

Black PeopleHealth LiteracyMental DisordersMental HealthMental Health ServicesAdolescentCost-Benefit AnalysisCost-Effectiveness AnalysisFeasibility StudiesHealthcare DisparitiesHumansPilot ProjectsRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicUnited KingdomFeasibility StudiesHealth EquityMENTAL HEALTHPragmatic Clinical TrialPUBLIC HEALTH

Identifiers

PMID41857862
PMCPMC13007151

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.