ArticleBMJ open2026
Experience of patients with total knee arthroplasty for knee osteoarthritis in China: a patient journey map based on qualitative research.
Article in BMJ open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThis study aimed to address the lack of a holistic understanding of the total knee arthroplasty (TKA) journey in China by systematically mapping patient experiences to identify interconnected needs, emotional transitions and critical pain points across the entire care continuum.
designA longitudinal descriptive qualitative study using patient journey mapping methodology. Data from three sequential one-on-one semistructured interviews (preoperative, in-hospital postoperative and home rehabilitation phases) were chronologically coded into journey stages.
settingA tertiary hospital in Shanghai, China.
participantsTwelve patients scheduled for elective TKA, aged 61-80 years (mean 70.25±5.86).
resultsFive categories with 17 subcategories were identified: (1) declining quality of life drives the need for change, (2) trust compensates for information gaps in decision-making, (3) hospital adaptation challenges heighten anxiety, (4) strong support needs emerge post-surgery and (5) navigating complex home recovery needs with insecurity. The patient journey was mapped across four stages: intention to change, consultation and decision-making, hospitalisation and surgery and rehabilitation and recovery. Analysis revealed several cross-stage issues: (1) the influence of disease status and treatment decision quality on postoperative outcomes, (2) inadequate preadmission preparation hindering hospital adaptation and comorbidity management and (3) insufficient predischarge planning leading to negative post-hospital rehabilitation experiences.
conclusionsQuality deficits in early-stage interactions can trigger a cascading effect on subsequent patient experience and clinical outcomes. During the two critical phases of selecting a healthcare provider and deciding on surgery, patients undergo a transition from 'insufficient information support' to 'reliance on trust'. However, irrational decision-making and unrealistic expectations collectively form a potential risk for postoperative decisional regret and dissatisfaction. Underused preoperative preparation leads to difficulties during hospitalisation, while inadequate discharge support hinders home recovery. Identifying these cross-stage pain points highlights timely intervention opportunities. Future improvements can be achieved through process redesign and technology integration, such as intelligent decision aids and remote rehabilitation systems, to enhance overall patient experience and outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.