Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41857847›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2026

Cluster randomised controlled trial for service delivery redesign of primary care for people with diabetes: study protocol.

Agustina Mazzoni, Javier Roberti, Marina Guglielmino, Facundo Jorro-Baron, Yanina Mazzaresi, Andrea Falaschi, Jorgelina Alvarez, Luz Gibbons, Hannah H Leslie, Cecilia Silva and 2 more

Abstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Agustina MazzoniHealth Care Quality and Patient Safety Department, Institute for Clinical Effectiveness and Health Policy, Buenos Aires, Argentina amazzoni@iecs.org.ar.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3328-2705
Javier RobertiQualitative Research Unit, Institute for Clinical Effectiveness and Health Policy, Buenos Aires, Argentina.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4285-5061
Marina GuglielminoHealth Care Quality and Patient Safety Department, Institute for Clinical Effectiveness and Health Policy, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Facundo Jorro-BaronHealth Care Quality and Patient Safety Department, Institute for Clinical Effectiveness and Health Policy, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Yanina MazzaresiDepartment of Health Promotion and Prevention, Ministry of Health, Mendoza, Argentina.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0008-4720-5392
Andrea FalaschiDepartment of Epidemiology, Ministry of Health, Mendoza, Argentina.
Jorgelina AlvarezHealth Technology Assessment Agency, Ministry of Health, Mendoza, Argentina.
Luz GibbonsUnit of Statistics, Data Management and Information Systems, Institute for Clinical Effectiveness and Health Policy, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Hannah H LeslieUniversity of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7464-3645
Cecilia SilvaObra Social de Empleados Públicos de Mendoza, Mendoza, Argentina.
Patricia J GarciaSchool of Public Health, Cayetano Heredia Pervuvian University, Lima, Peru.
Ezequiel Garcia-ElorrioHealth Care Quality and Patient Safety Department, Institute for Clinical Effectiveness and Health Policy, Buenos Aires, Argentina.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionStrong primary healthcare enhances resource efficiency and resilience. Type 2 diabetes poses a growing global health challenge, with Argentina's healthcare system struggling to detect and manage the disease effectively. Many patients bypass primary healthcare for secondary facilities, undermining continuity of care and increasing costs. Following a diagnostic process in collaboration with policymakers, we propose evaluating a redesigned primary care model consisting of codesigned evidence-based implementation strategies to improve type 2 diabetes management in Mendoza, Argentina. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This is an efficient, parallel-arm cluster randomised controlled Hybrid Type II trial with 12 clusters (administrative areas with 2-3 health facilities) allocated 1:1 to control (usual care) or intervention. In phase I, we will codesign, pilot and refine an implementation strategy package. In phase II, we will conduct the trial: 9-month baseline data collection, 15-month intervention and 6-month sustainability period. We will enrol a cohort of 396 patients with type 2 diabetes at primary healthcare centres and follow them for 12 months during the intervention and 6 months sustainment using routine clinical records and patient surveys. In phase III, we will conduct analysis, report and disseminate findings. The primary outcome will be a composite outcome including glycaemic control (glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) <8%); blood pressure control (<140/90 mm Hg) and statin prescription (limited to patients ≥40 years) from clinical records. The primary analysis will compare the proportion of patients achieving this composite clinical outcome between the trial arms at the end of the study. Secondary analyses include assessing patient experience and primary healthcare engagement; testing the implementation strategies' impact on service use patterns, system competence, user confidence and cost per visit; exploring inequalities by sociodemographic factors; and assessing patient empowerment. We will use all available data from all randomised clusters and conduct all analyses on the intention-to-treat population, regardless of intervention adherence. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: All study activities will comply with national and international ethics guidelines, presenting minimal risk to participants. The protocol was submitted and approved by the local independent ethics committee at the Mendoza Ministry of Health (Consejo Provincial de Evaluación ética en investigación en Salud-Provincial Health Research Ethics Review Board, Reference number: 149/2024). Facility-level permission will be obtained for participation and sharing of deidentified data. Written informed consent will be required from study participants, who will receive information on the study's purpose, procedures, risks and benefits. Dissemination activities and outputs will include writing and submitting manuscripts for publication; writing policy briefs to support strategy implementation in other regions or countries; and tailoring outputs for patients, clinicians and researchers. We anticipate that improvements in disease management and patient experience will have clinical and economic benefits related to reduced usage of secondary-level and tertiary-level facilities, lower cost per visit and a reduced number of clinical events related to diabetes. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN63277390.

Indexed as

Delivery of Health CareDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2Primary Health CareArgentinaGlycated HemoglobinHumansResearch DesignGlycated HemoglobinDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2Implementation SciencePrimary Health CareRandomized Controlled Trial

Identifiers

PMID41857847
PMCPMC13007129

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.