Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41857845›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2026

Development and validation of the environmental parenting scale: a precaution theory-based measure of preventive parenting behaviours.

Haekyung Jo, Hyun-Kyoung Kim

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Haekyung JoJeonju University, Jeonju, Jeollabuk-do, Korea (the Republic of).
Hyun-Kyoung KimKongju National University, Gongju, Korea (the Republic of) hkk@kongju.ac.kr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2782-108X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThis study developed and validated the precaution theory-based Environmental Parenting Scale (EPS) to assess proactive parental behaviours that reduce children's environmental risk exposure. Existing measures lack theory-based assessments of preventive parenting under environmental uncertainty.

designThis study involves the development of a scale based on Kriebel's precaution theory to construct measures of environmental parenting behaviour. SETTING/

participantsFor exploratory factor analysis, 216 participants with children under the age of 18 were recruited from Jeonju, Cheonan and Milyang in South Korea between 16 September 2024 and 21 September 2024 using convenience sampling. Content validity was confirmed by three professionals. VALIDATION: The preliminary items were gathered through a literature review and in-depth interviews with 10 participants. We assessed convergence validity, known-group validity and internal consistency reliability. Exploratory factor analysis revealed a cumulative variance of 65.73% for explaining the target behaviours.

resultsThe EPS comprises 21 items across four factors: hygiene management, natural product use, prevention of toxin exposure and protection from radiation. Convergent validity with the personal environmental health behaviours scale was supported (

conclusionThe EPS is a valid and reliable scale for measuring environmental parenting behaviours in the context of climate change and environmental diseases.

Indexed as

Environmental ExposureHealth BehaviorParentingAdolescentAdultChildChild, PreschoolFactor Analysis, StatisticalFemaleHumansMalePsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsRepublic of KoreaSurveys and QuestionnairesEnvironmental healthHealth BehaviorParentingStatistical Factor Analysis

Identifiers

PMID41857845
PMCPMC13007066

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.