ArticleBMJ open2026
Effectiveness of manual diaphragmatic techniques in adults with non-specific low back pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol.
Article in BMJ open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionNon-specific low back pain (NSLBP) is one of the leading causes of disability worldwide. Emerging evidence suggests that altered diaphragmatic function may be associated with lumbar pain, impaired trunk stabilisation and functional disability. Manual diaphragmatic techniques have been proposed as an intervention to modulate diaphragmatic tension, mobility and neuromyofascial relationships; however, their effectiveness has not yet been synthesised using rigorous systematic review methods. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This protocol follows Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols guidance and has been prospectively registered in PROSPERO. Randomised controlled trials evaluating manual techniques specifically applied to the diaphragm in adults with NSLBP will be eligible. The primary outcomes will include pain intensity and functional disability; secondary outcomes will include lumbar mobility, respiratory function, quality of life and adverse events. Searches will be performed in PubMed/MEDLINE, Cochrane CENTRAL, PEDro, CINAHL, Scopus, Embase and clinical trial registries without language or date restrictions. Two reviewers will independently perform study selection, data extraction and risk-of-bias (RoB) assessment using the Cochrane RoB 2 tool. Where appropriate, a random-effects meta-analysis will be conducted; the certainty of evidence will be evaluated using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach. Substantial clinical and methodological heterogeneity is anticipated across trials, which may limit the feasibility of quantitative data pooling. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: As this study uses data from previously published trials, ethical approval is not required. Findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publication, conference presentations and a plain-language summary for clinical stakeholders. PROSPERO REGISTRATION: CRD420251172616.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.