Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41857826›Full record

Trial reportBMJ open2026

Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) over the dorso-lateral-prefrontal cortex in combination with exercises for the treatment of individuals with chronic low back pain (STOP-Low Back Pain Trial): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.

Thomas Pourchet, Stéphane Armand, Cristiano Martins, Simon Barrué-Belou, Stéphane Genevay, Pierre Nicolo

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMJ open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05757609 (Innovative Non-invasive Brain Stimulation in the Rehabilitation of Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05757609 narecruitingnot on this map

Innovative Non-invasive Brain Stimulation in the Rehabilitation of Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain

TypeinterventionalSponsorStephane ARMANDRan2023 to 2026Enrolled48ConditionsChronic Low Back PainArmsAnodal tDCS combined with active physiotherapy, Sham anodal tDCS combined with active physiotherapy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Thomas PourchetMedicine, UNIGE, Geneva, Switzerland thomas.pourchet@hesge.ch.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0006-1905-1598
Stéphane ArmandUNIGE, Geneva, Switzerland.
Cristiano MartinsHaute école de santé, HES-SO Genève, Vernier, Switzerland.
Simon Barrué-BelouLa Tour Hopital Prive SA, Meyrin, Switzerland.
Stéphane GenevayRheumatology, HUG, Geneva, Switzerland.
Pierre NicoloHaute école de santé, HES-SO Genève, Genève, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionChronic low back pain (CLBP) remains a leading cause of disability worldwide and imposes a substantial personal and socioeconomic burden. Despite exercise being the first-line recommended intervention in clinical guidelines, its efficacy on pain relief remains modest and the hypoalgesia induced by exercise seems to be limited in individuals with musculoskeletal pain. Previous transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) studies have mainly targeted the motor cortex, yielding heterogeneous results, underscoring the need to evaluate alternative brain areas. Recently, tDCS studies targeting the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) may enhance endogenous pain modulation and thereby potentiate the response to exercise. This study aims to compare the effects of adjunctive anodal DLPFC tDCS combined with a standardised exercise programme versus sham tDCS combined with the same exercise programme on pain and function in adults with CLBP. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This is a single-centre, triple-blinded, parallel-group randomised controlled trial. 48 participants with CLBP will be randomly assigned to receive either anodal tDCS over the left PFC combined with exercises, or sham tDCS combined with the same exercise programme, over nine sessions during a 3-week period. The primary outcome is the change in the multidimensional impact of CLBP, assessed using the Core Outcome Measures Index, from baseline to postintervention (week 4). Secondary outcomes include pain intensity, disability, psychological factors (fear-avoidance beliefs, catastrophising, anxiety, depression), measured at baseline, postintervention and at 12- and 24-week follow-up. Functional brain connectivity via electroencephalography and neuromuscular function of the erector spinae (flexion-relaxation phenomenon) will be measured at baseline and postintervention. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study was approved by the Commission Cantonale d'Ethique de la Recherche sur l'être humain (CCER) in December 2022 (reference number: 2022-D0077). Written informed consent will be obtained from all participants. The results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications and presentations at national and international conferences. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT05757609.

Indexed as

Chronic PainDorsolateral Prefrontal CortexExercise TherapyLow Back PainPrefrontal CortexTranscranial Direct Current StimulationAdultCombined Modality TherapyFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPain MeasurementResearch DesignTreatment OutcomeYoung AdultBack painChronic PainPAIN MANAGEMENTPhysical Therapy Modalities

Identifiers

PMID41857826
PMCPMC13007130

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.