ArticleBMJ open2026
Cost-benefit analysis of a 24/7 text-based online emotional support platform for at-risk youth in Hong Kong.
Article in BMJ open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThis study was to estimate the potential social value and net benefit of OpenUp, a 24/7 text-based online counselling service for youth in Hong Kong, and draw policy-relevant conclusions for service provision.
designA retrospective, model-based cost-benefit analysis using social return on investment (SROI) methods. Adopting a societal perspective, service, health and social outcomes were valued over a 1-year period, and productivity gains associated with avoided suicide deaths were valued over a 10-year period. Costs are reported in 2022 HK dollars (HK$; US$1=HK$7.8). Reporting was guided by Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards 2022 (CHEERS 2022) Statement.
settingA text-based, synchronous online emotional support counselling platform in Hong Kong was accessible through WhatsApp, Facebook, SMS and the official web portal.
participantsA total of 19 543 users aged 11-35 years accessed OpenUp services during the study period (1 December 2020 to 31 May 2022). PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: These included total social value (HK$), net social benefit (social value minus investment) and the SROI ratio. The secondary outcomes included monetised savings in medical and social services and productivity gains from avoiding suicide attempts and death.
resultsThe total social value was estimated to be HK$226 119 729 against an investment of HK$47 655 000 (SROI=4.74). Suicide risk reduction (productivity gains from avoided attempts and deaths) accounted for 75.4% of the social value. Deterministic one-way sensitivity analyses yielded SROI values ranging from 3.62 to 6.99 aggregated across the three groups, with results being most sensitive to assumptions about the duration of productivity impacts for avoided attempts and avoidable mortality.
conclusionsBased on conservative assumptions, OpenUp can generate potential social value by providing an online emotional support service. Given the study's reliance on modelling and proxy monetisation, these estimates should be interpreted with caution. Further integration of offline services with online intervention strategies requires continuous investment and evaluation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.