ArticleBMJ open2026
Reporting completeness and outcomes of the diet- and nutrition-related systematic review planning process: protocol for a meta-epidemiological study.
Article in BMJ open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionDietary recommendations should be based on scientific evidence, and ideally, systematic reviews (SRs) are conducted as part of the guideline development process. The usability of SRs for decision-making is primarily determined by the quality of the evidence from available primary studies, as well as the quality of the SRs themselves. A comprehensive SR protocol ensures high-quality implementation and minimises bias, while making these protocols publicly accessible, promotes transparency and prevents redundancy. The PROSPERO database offers valuable insights into planned methodologies. The aim of this study is to investigate the completeness of reporting in SR protocols for diet- or nutrition-related trials, determine how this has changed over time, and examine the publication of completed SRs by comparing their content with those described in the corresponding protocols. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We developed a systematic search strategy for PROSPERO to identify nutrition- or diet-related SR protocols registered at two different time points (2019 and 2024). Following a screening process to identify eligible protocols, relevant predefined data will be extracted. Subsequently, a structured search will be conducted to identify potential journal publications of the selected protocols, as well as publications describing the results of the SRs, from which relevant predefined data will be also extracted. The methodology of the published articles will be compared with the corresponding a priori protocols registered in PROSPERO. The PROSPERO records registered in 2019 will be compared with those registered in 2024. The results will be evaluated by descriptive statistics, the reporting completeness of PROSPERO records will be assessed based on Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic review and Meta-Analysis Protocols (PRISMA-P), the planned use of any approaches to assess certainty of evidence will be investigated, and the adherence of published SRs to the methodological details outlined in their corresponding PROSPERO entries will be examined. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Since both databases and publications used in this study are publicly available, ethical approval is not required. Results of the study will be submitted for publication in an international, peer-reviewed journal. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: The present study has previously been registered with the Open Science Framework (https://osf.io/8fsx7).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.