Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41857817›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2026

Biphasic sleep in shift workers and its related outcomes: a scoping review protocol.

Line Victoria Moen, Jenny-Anne S Lie, Ingrid Løken Jørgensen, Lars Frøjd, Ståle Pallesen, Dagfinn Matre

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Line Victoria MoenNational Institute of Occupational Health (STAMI), Oslo, Norway line.moen@stami.no.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0008-6270-6363
Jenny-Anne S LieNational Institute of Occupational Health (STAMI), Oslo, Norway.
Ingrid Løken JørgensenNational Institute of Occupational Health (STAMI), Oslo, Norway.
Lars FrøjdDepartment of Neurology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Ståle PallesenDepartment of Psychosocial Science, University of Bergen, Bergen, Hordaland, Norway.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5831-0840
Dagfinn MatreNational Institute of Occupational Health (STAMI), Oslo, Norway.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0042-6389

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionShift work is associated with disrupted sleep, circadian misalignment and increased risks of adverse health, performance and safety outcomes. Although recommendations for shift workers typically focus on obtaining one long sleep period, many shift workers divide sleep into two episodes, referred to as biphasic sleep. Biphasic sleep may help mitigate sleep loss-related impairments, yet its prevalence, characteristics and potential benefits for shift working populations remain unclear. Existing reviews have examined sleep duration, mental health, or the consequences of shift work broadly, but none have specifically mapped evidence comparing biphasic and monophasic sleep between shifts. This scoping review will identify and summarise the available literature on biphasic sleep among adult shift workers. In addition, we will describe the outcomes and subsequently highlight any possible gaps to inform future research. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This review will follow the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology for scoping reviews and be reported in accordance with the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses extension for scoping reviews guidelines. Biphasic sleep is defined as two distinct sleep episodes within a 24-hour period between work shifts, including two similarly timed sleep periods or one longer sleep combined with a shorter nap. A comprehensive search will be conducted in April 2026 in MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, Web of Science and CENTRAL using controlled vocabulary (eg, Medical Subject Headings) and free-text terms related to shift work and split sleep. Peer-reviewed primary research examining biphasic sleep among adult shift workers will be included, and studies focusing solely on naps during work hours will be excluded. Two reviewers will independently screen titles/abstracts and full texts, with discrepancies resolved through discussion or by consulting a third reviewer. Data will be extracted using a standardised template including study characteristics, sleep parameters and reported outcomes. Results will be summarised descriptively and presented in tables and evidence maps. No statistical synthesis will be performed. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This scoping review will synthesise data from articles published in peer-reviewed journals. As no primary data will be collected and no human participants will be involved, the review is exempted from formal ethical approval. Findings will be disseminated in terms of a peer-reviewed publication and will inform future systematic reviews on sleep strategies among shift workers. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: This project is registered with the Open Science Framework accessible at 10.17605/OSF.IO/WY7KJ.

Indexed as

Shift Work ScheduleSleepSleep Disorders, Circadian RhythmWork Schedule ToleranceHumansResearch DesignScoping Reviews as TopicSleep DurationOccupational Health ServicesSLEEP MEDICINEWorkplace

Identifiers

PMID41857817
PMCPMC13007107

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.