ArticleJournal of health, population, and nutrition2026
Impact of BCNSP-led parenteral nutrition management on prescribing errors in the neonatal intensive care unit.
Article in Journal of health, population, and nutrition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundParenteral nutrition (PN) preparations are listed as high-alert medications and have a high probability of medication errors (MEs). Board-certified Nutrition Support Pharmacists (BCNSPs) can play an important role in reducing PN-associated complications by highlighting the gaps in the PN prescribing process. This study aimed to determine the impact of BCNSP-led PN review on the identification and documentation of prescribing MEs (PMEs) to optimize quality and safety in PN prescribing processes.
methodsThis QI quasi-experimental study included all neonates admitted to a level III neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) and prescribed PN. All identified and recognized PN-PMEs documented by pharmacists were evaluated in pre-and post-implementation-phases. In the pre-phase, the PN-duty pharmacist reviewed all the neonatal PN-orders while located in the pharmacy, and in the post-phase, a clinically involved BCNSP performed this task. All PN-PMEs were categorized into ten types. Predictors of PN-PMEs were analyzed through logistic regression.
resultsPN-orders were prescribed to 98 and 112 neonates in pre-and post-phases, respectively. For demographic and clinical variables, neonates were comparable. A median of 12 (range = 9 - 19) vs. 15 (range = 12-22) PN-orders/day were reviewed in pre-and post-phases. Documented PN-PMEs for all PN orders were significantly higher in the post-phase (212/2577, 8.23%) compared with the pre-phase (25/2577, 0.97%; p < 0.001). "Wrong Dose/Calculation" was the most reported category (88/2577, 3.41%). "Wrong concentration range" was the second highest (29/1309, 2.22%) and all were reported only in post-phase. Additional errors involved infusion, compatibility, and osmolarity deviations, renal/hepatic dose adjustment errors and stability errors. Most of them were only identified in the post-phase. Post-phase outcomes showed clinically meaningful reductions in metabolic derangements, NICU stay, and mortality (p < 0.001).
conclusionThe engagement of BCNSPs in the clinical neonatal setting for PN management may improve the safety and efficacy of PN-therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.