ArticleInterdisciplinary cardiovascular and thoracic surgery2026
Non-Pharmacological Option in Postoperative Pain: Pilot Study of Intraoperative Pulsed Radiofrequency.
Article in Interdisciplinary cardiovascular and thoracic surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesPostoperative pain remains a discomfort for patients undergoing thoracic surgery despite advances in minimally invasive techniques. Pulsed radiofrequency (PRF) is a minimally invasive neuromodulation method used for chronic pain. This pilot study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of intraoperative PRF (iPRF) as an adjunct to conventional analgesia (thoracic epidural analgesia [TEA] or intercostal nerve block [INB]) in alleviating postoperative pain and analgesic use following minimally invasive thoracic surgery.
methodsA prospective pilot cohort was compared with historical controls at a single tertiary hospital in Japan. The iPRF group (n = 30) received PRF targeting the intercostal nerves intraoperatively in addition to standard analgesia. The control group comprised retrospective patients who received standard analgesia alone. Patients were stratified into TEA and INB subgroups according to procedure type. The primary end-point was the proportion of patients requiring additional analgesics. Secondary end-points included pain scores (numerical rating scale [NRS]), incidence of intercostal neuralgia, and side effects.
resultsIntraoperative PRF significantly reduced the need for additional analgesics in TEA (26.7% vs 60.0%, P = .027) and INB (6.7% vs 42.1, P = .020) subgroups. In the TEA group, iPRF also reduced the proportion of patients reporting NRS ≥4 following drain removal (26.7% vs 60.0%, P = .027). The incidence of analgesic-induced side effects was significantly lower in the iPRF INB group (0% vs 28.6%, P = .031). No adverse events were associated with iPRF.
conclusionsIntraoperative PRF may be a safe and effective adjunctive method for postoperative pain alleviation in thoracic surgery, reducing analgesic requirements. CLINICAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: The Institutional Review Board of St. Luke's International Hospital approved the study (No. 24-R085) on September 9, 2024.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.