ReviewJournal of biological engineering2026
Exosome-loaded hydrogels for bone regeneration: a cell-free therapeutic strategy.
Review in Journal of biological engineering, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Reprogramming the Aging Type H Vascular Niche via Myeloid Angiogenic Cell-Derived Extracellular Vesicles: Mechanisms, Engineering Strategies, and Translational Perspectives.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Advancing fat graft survival: from adipose-derived stem cell mechanisms to next-generation regenerative strategies.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Bone defects present significant challenges in clinical practice due to the limitations of traditional treatments. Compared to traditional cell therapies, exosome-based therapies have emerged as a promising alternative, offering a cell-free therapeutic strategy that harnesses the regenerative potential of stem cells. Exosome-based therapies are without the risks associated with live cell therapies, such as immune rejection and the complexities of large-scale cell culture systems. However, challenges such as stability and targeted delivery remain in the clinical translation of exosome therapies. To address these, recent advancements have focused on exosome-loaded hydrogels, which provide a controlled release system for exosomes, protecting them from degradation and ensuring sustained therapeutic effects at the bone defect site. These hydrogel systems offer an ideal environment for cell attachment, migration, and tissue formation, enhancing bone healing. This review explores exosomes in bone tissue engineering derived from mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs), adipose-derived stem cells (ADSCs), and other resources such as dental pulp stem cells (DPSCs), urine derived stem cells (USCs), and even skeletal stem cells (SSCs). Moreover, innovative strategies have been used to enhance the efficacy of exosome-based therapies, such as exosome mimetics‑loaded hydrogels as a scalable cell‑free strategy and “armored exosomes” as protective exosome formulations in functional hydrogels. There are challenges in clinical application, such as standardization of exosome production, long-term stability, immune response, and regulatory approval. Exosome-loaded hydrogels offer a scalable, effective, and safe alternative to traditional cell-based therapies in bone regeneration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.