Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41857725›Full record

ArticleJournal of translational medicine2026

Efficacy and safety analysis of CAR-T cell salvage therapy in relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma after failure of bispecific antibody treatment.

Fuli Li, Henan Wang, Yuanzheng Liang, Xindi Liu, Jin Ye, Na Yao, Lei Yang, Yiping Wu, Liang Wang, Jia Cong

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of translational medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Fuli LiDepartment of Hematology, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Henan WangDepartment of Hematology, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Yuanzheng LiangDepartment of Hematology, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Xindi LiuDepartment of Hematology, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Jin YeDepartment of Hematology, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Na YaoDepartment of Hematology, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Lei YangDepartment of Hematology, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Yiping WuDepartment of Hematology, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Liang Wang *Department of Hematology, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China. wangliangtrhos@126.com.
Jia Cong *Department of Hematology, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China. congjia21@163.com.ORCID 0000-0002-5001-6575

Funding

Noncommunicable Chronic Diseases-National Science and Technology Major Project of China 2025ZD0544300
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatients with relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (R/R DLBCL) who failed bispecific antibody (BsAb) therapy face an extremely poor prognosis, necessitating exploration of effective salvage strategies. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy in this population.

methodsWe retrospectively enrolled 12 consecutive R/R DLBCL patients who received CAR-T therapy after BsAb failure at Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, between July 2023 and February 2025.Clinical data were reviewed to evaluate efficacy and safety outcomes.

resultsThe 12 patients (M: F = 6:6) had a median age of 53 years (range: 34–65), a median IPI of 3 (range: 1–5), and with a median of 5 prior lines of therapy (range: 1–8). The majority (91.7%, 11/12) had ≥ 2 extranodal sites, and 25% (3/12) had bulky disease (> 7.5 cm). Prior to CAR-T, 33.3% (4/12) were bispecific antibody-relapsed and 66.7% (8/12) were bispecific antibody-refractory. BsAb targets included CD3/CD20 (n = 9; commercial glofitamab n = 7, investigational n = 2) and CD3/CD19 (n = 3, investigational). CAR-T products were CD19/CD22 dual-target (n = 10) and CD19 single-target (n = 2). The median washout period from last BsAb to lymphapheresis was 42 days (range: 8–172).With a median follow-up of 9.3 months (range: 5.3–14), the best overall response rate was 100% (complete response 50%, partial response 50%).Median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were not reached. The Kaplan-Meier estimates showed 12-month PFS and OS rates were 54.5% and 50.5%, respectively.Cytokine release syndrome occurred in 83.3% (all grade 1–2) and ICANS in 8.3%(all grade 1). Hematologic toxicities were frequent, with grade ≥ 3 neutropenia (100%), anemia (33.3%), and thrombocytopenia (33.3%). Non-hematologic toxicities included grade 1 AST/ALT elevations (33.3%) and coagulation abnormalities (elevated D-dimer 41.7%; grade ≥ 3 hypofibrinogenemia 16.7%). All adverse events were manageable with standard interventions, and no treatment-related deaths occurred.

conclusionCAR-T salvage therapy demonstrated high response rates and manageable safety in BsAb R/R DLBCL patients. Early survival data suggest promising clinical benefit in this high-risk population of BsAb-resistant patients, though extended follow-up is needed to confirm durability. This study provides supporting evidence for CAR-T as a potential salvage strategy in this setting.

Indexed as

Antibodies, BispecificImmunotherapy, AdoptiveLymphoma, Large B-Cell, DiffuseNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalSalvage TherapyAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRecurrenceTreatment FailureTreatment OutcomeAntibodies, BispecificBispecific antibodiesCAR-T cell therapyDiffuse large B-cell lymphomaSalvage therapySurvival analysis

Identifiers

PMID41857725
PMCPMC13122911

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.