ArticleJournal of translational medicine2026
Efficacy and safety analysis of CAR-T cell salvage therapy in relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma after failure of bispecific antibody treatment.
Article in Journal of translational medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Beyond resistance: optimizing CAR-T sequencing following bispecific antibody failure in DLBCL.Journal of translational medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPatients with relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (R/R DLBCL) who failed bispecific antibody (BsAb) therapy face an extremely poor prognosis, necessitating exploration of effective salvage strategies. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy in this population.
methodsWe retrospectively enrolled 12 consecutive R/R DLBCL patients who received CAR-T therapy after BsAb failure at Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, between July 2023 and February 2025.Clinical data were reviewed to evaluate efficacy and safety outcomes.
resultsThe 12 patients (M: F = 6:6) had a median age of 53 years (range: 34–65), a median IPI of 3 (range: 1–5), and with a median of 5 prior lines of therapy (range: 1–8). The majority (91.7%, 11/12) had ≥ 2 extranodal sites, and 25% (3/12) had bulky disease (> 7.5 cm). Prior to CAR-T, 33.3% (4/12) were bispecific antibody-relapsed and 66.7% (8/12) were bispecific antibody-refractory. BsAb targets included CD3/CD20 (n = 9; commercial glofitamab n = 7, investigational n = 2) and CD3/CD19 (n = 3, investigational). CAR-T products were CD19/CD22 dual-target (n = 10) and CD19 single-target (n = 2). The median washout period from last BsAb to lymphapheresis was 42 days (range: 8–172).With a median follow-up of 9.3 months (range: 5.3–14), the best overall response rate was 100% (complete response 50%, partial response 50%).Median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were not reached. The Kaplan-Meier estimates showed 12-month PFS and OS rates were 54.5% and 50.5%, respectively.Cytokine release syndrome occurred in 83.3% (all grade 1–2) and ICANS in 8.3%(all grade 1). Hematologic toxicities were frequent, with grade ≥ 3 neutropenia (100%), anemia (33.3%), and thrombocytopenia (33.3%). Non-hematologic toxicities included grade 1 AST/ALT elevations (33.3%) and coagulation abnormalities (elevated D-dimer 41.7%; grade ≥ 3 hypofibrinogenemia 16.7%). All adverse events were manageable with standard interventions, and no treatment-related deaths occurred.
conclusionCAR-T salvage therapy demonstrated high response rates and manageable safety in BsAb R/R DLBCL patients. Early survival data suggest promising clinical benefit in this high-risk population of BsAb-resistant patients, though extended follow-up is needed to confirm durability. This study provides supporting evidence for CAR-T as a potential salvage strategy in this setting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.