Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41857698›Full record

ArticleBMC nursing2026

Evidence-based intrapartum supportive care in Türkiye: a randomized controlled trial.

Esra Cevik, Emre Yanikkerem

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC nursing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06024811 (Investigation of the Effect of Supporting Nursing Care Provided in Line With Evidence-Based Practices During Intrapartum Period), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06024811 completednot on this map

Investigation of the Effect of Supporting Nursing Care Provided in Line With Evidence-Based Practices During Intrapartum Period

TypeobservationalSponsorBalikesir UniversityRan2020 to 2021Enrolled1ConditionsDelivery, Breech, StillbirthArmssupporting nursing care
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Esra CevikDepartment of Midwifery, Faculty of Health Sciences, Balıkesir University, Balıkesir, Turkey. esra.cevik@balikesir.edu.tr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2798-9202
Emre YanikkeremDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, Manisa Celal Bayar University, Manisa, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8909-3597

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe integration of evidence-based supportive care practices into intrapartum care is increasingly emphasized in international guidelines, as such practices are considered fundamental to ensuring safe, respectful, and woman-centered maternity services. Despite growing awareness, supportive practices remain under-implemented in clinical settings. Therefore, this study aimed at investigating the effect of supportive care provided in line with evidence-based practices during the intrapartum period.

methodsThe study has a randomized controlled intervention design, in which participants were randomly allocated to the intervention or control group. This study was conducted in a public hospital, a province in Balıkesir, Türkiye. The study sample comprised (n = 104) pregnant women assigned to the intervention (n = 52) and control (n = 52) groups. Participants were matched for age, education level, body mass index, the number of births and pregnancies, and participation in prenatal preparation classes. During the intrapartum period, the participants in the intervention and control groups were given supportive care and routine care, respectively. The Descriptive Characteristics of Women Questionnaire, State Anxiety Inventory (SAI), Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), pain diagram, and labor and postpartum evaluation form were used to collect the data. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 26.0. Group comparisons were performed using chi-square and Fisher’s exact test for categorical variables and Student’s t-test for continuous variables showing a normal distribution. Intra-group comparisons were performed using paired t-tests, and repeated measures were analyzed using analysis of variance with Bonferroni post hoc correction. Effect sizes were calculated using Cohen’s d. In the analysis of the data, Student’s t-test, paired t-test, repeated measures of ANOVA (post hoc: Bonferroni) and Cohen’s d were used.

resultsThe participants in the intervention group tended to have lower mean VAS and SAI in the latent, active and transition phases after they received supportive care. The duration of labor was shorter with the intervention compared to the control group (9.2 ± 5.4 h vs. 12.6 ± 6.8 h, p = .005). The perceived difficulty of labor was also lower with the intervetion (7.8 ± 2.0 vs. 9.4 ± 1.2, p < .001). Maternal satisfaction scores were higher with the intervention compared to the control group (9.9 ± 0.2 vs. 7.2 ± 1.6, p < .001).

conclusionThe research found that pregnant women who received supportive care during labor, tended to have lower perceived labor pain and state anxiety levels, shorter labor duration, and lower perceived difficulty during labor compared to those who received standard care. Additionally, the postpartum maternal satisfaction scores tended to be higher in the intervention group. Future research should focus on longitudinal studies evaluating the effects of supportive care provided during the intrapartum period on the postpartum well-being of mothers and the breastfeeding process. TRIAL AND PROTOCOL REGISTRATION: This randomized controlled trial was retrospectively registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT06024811) on July 25, 2023. REPORTING

methodStudy methods and results reported in adherence to the CONSORT Statement.

Indexed as

Labor painState anxietySupportive care

Identifiers

PMID41857698
PMCPMC13011301

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.