Trial reportTrials2026
Recruiting US veterans with chronic low back pain in a multisite randomized pragmatic trial.
Trial report in Trials, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04087291 (VERDICT), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
VERDICT (Veterans Response to Dosage in Chiropractic Therapy): A Pragmatic Randomized Trial Addressing Dose Effects for Chronic Low Back Pain
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundEvidence on recruitment strategies for Veterans Health Administration (VA) pragmatic clinical trials (PCTs) is scarce. This study compares multiple approaches and evaluates engagement, efficiency, and representativeness in the integrated care setting of VA.
methodsWe examined recruitment and screening processes used in the Veterans Response to Dosage in Chiropractic Therapy (VERDICT) PCT. Veterans with chronic low back pain were recruited and enrolled in 4 US VA facilities from February 2021 to May 2024. We used 3 recruitment strategies: existing referrals for chiropractic services, electronic health record (EHR) prescreen, and self-referral. Pre-enrollment contacts occurred through postal mail, email, and in-person or virtual baseline visits. We used 5 sequential screening steps leading to final eligibility determination: (1) identify and notify, (2) phone screen, (3) consent, (4) eligibility questions, and (5) chiropractic consultation.
resultsWe screened 3667 veterans: 91% were identified through existing referrals, 7% through EHR prescreen, and 2% through self-referral; 62% received postal-only recruitment materials, 38% received a combination of postal + email materials, and 83% had a virtual baseline visit. Over 39 months, 766 individuals were enrolled and randomized. Due to limited VA chiropractic clinic capacity, 19% of eligible veterans were not enrolled. Across all steps of the screening process, 45% were not interested, and 35% were ineligible. Using existing referrals was the most efficient strategy, with a median time from notification to randomization of 23 days. Those emailed invitations had a median response time of 16 days, compared with 30 days for postal-only invitations. The existing referrals strategy was the most effective for recruiting racial and ethnic minorities (33%). EHR prescreen resulted in the highest proportion of female veterans (79%).
conclusionsThis study is among the few to compare multiple recruitment strategies in a VA PCT while assessing engagement, efficiency, and representativeness. VERDICT shows that PCTs can overcome recruitment challenges through adaptable, multifaceted approaches. By addressing systemic barriers and implementing email and virtual strategies, we improved recruitment engagement and diversity. These methods can inform recruitment for trials in other VA-based and real-world settings.
trial registrationClinical trial registration number: NCT04087291. Participant enrollment began on February 22, 2021, and ended on May 10, 2024. Registered on August 27, 2019.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.