Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41857683›Full record

ArticleBMC psychology2026

Binge-watching and substance use in adolescents: a cross-sectional study of behavioral risk factors and gender differences.

Jorge Becerra-Arroyo, Nicolás Ruiz-Robledillo, Rosario Ferrer-Cascales, Natalia Albaladejo-Blázquez, Borja Costa-López, Cristian Alcocer-Bruno

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jorge Becerra-ArroyoDepartment of Health Psychology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Alicante, Alicante, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0005-1686-9098
Nicolás Ruiz-RobledilloDepartment of Health Psychology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Alicante, Alicante, Spain. nicolas.ruiz@ua.es.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7522-5162
Rosario Ferrer-CascalesDepartment of Health Psychology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Alicante, Alicante, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6015-7454
Natalia Albaladejo-BlázquezDepartment of Health Psychology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Alicante, Alicante, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9116-9092
Borja Costa-LópezDepartment of Health Psychology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Alicante, Alicante, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6658-768X
Cristian Alcocer-BrunoDepartment of Health Psychology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Alicante, Alicante, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0007-7364-5749

Funding

Alicante City Council - Department of Education and the Community Prevention Unit for Addictive Behaviors (UPCCA) AYTOALICANTE1-22T
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundProblematic binge-watching, defined as the compulsive consumption of audiovisual content for prolonged periods of time, has increased in prevalence, especially among adolescents. However, its relationship with the development of risk behaviors, such as the consumption of psychoactive substances, has been scarcely studied. These substances use behaviors could result in negative outcomes, such as health problems, interpersonal conflicts, and academic difficulties. The objective of the present study is to analyze the relationship between binge-watching, substance use and problem behaviors in a sample of Spanish adolescents.

methodsA total of 940 Spanish adolescents (aged 14–18 years, M = 15.44, SD = 0.77; 57% boys, 43% girls) were recruited from public (68%) and private (32%) high schools. Substance use and problem behaviors were assessed using the Spanish Survey on Drug Use in Secondary Education (ESTUDES), while binge-watching was assessed using the Spanish version of the Binge-Watching Engagement and Symptoms Questionnaire. Associations were examined using Mann-Whitney U test and logistic regression models controlling for gender.

resultsMann-Whitney U analyses revealed that adolescents reporting alcohol use, tobacco use, energy drinks, or energy drinks mixed with alcohol scored significantly higher on multiple binge-watching dimensions, particularly “Dependency” and “Loss of Control”. Arguments with parents were associated with higher binge-watching levels, whereas the findings for trouble concentrating at school were less consistent across analyses. Gender-stratified analyses showed that these associations were stronger among female adolescents. Logistic regression models controlling for gender confirmed that higher scores on “Dependency” and “Loss of Control” significantly predicted psychoactive substance use, supporting the presence of overlapping risk patterns between problematic dimensions of binge-watching and substance-related behaviors. No significant associations were found with bullying victimization, which may reflect that binge-watching is primarily related to individual coping and internalizing behaviors, rather than peer-directed aggression.

conclusionsThe combined influence of psychoactive substance use and problematic binge-watching behavior could be explained by factors such as immediate gratification, emotional avoidance, or disruptive coping strategies to manage stress or anxiety, which would be related to other problem behaviors. These findings underline the need to develop preventive strategies that include a gender perspective in order to promote responsible consumption of audiovisual content among adolescents.

Indexed as

Adolescent BehaviorRisk-TakingSubstance-Related DisordersAdolescentCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleRisk FactorsSex FactorsSpainAdolescentsBehavioral addictionBinge-watchingPsychoactive substancesRisk behaviors

Identifiers

PMID41857683
PMCPMC13123204

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.