Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41857603›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2026

Human resources, infrastructure, and supply systems for refractive error care in Bhutan: A WHO RESAT analysis.

Indra Prasad Sharma, Kovin Shunmugam Naidoo, Khathutshelo Percy Mashige, Nor Tshering Lepcha, Dechen Wangmo, Sonam Peldon

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Indra Prasad SharmaDepartment of Ophthalmology, Jigme Dorji Wangchuck National Referral Hospital, Thimphu, Bhutan. indrapsharma@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8815-794X
Kovin Shunmugam NaidooDiscipline of Optometry, School of Health Sciences, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8261-9779
Khathutshelo Percy MashigeDiscipline of Optometry, School of Health Sciences, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8199-0891
Nor Tshering LepchaDepartment of Ophthalmology, Jigme Dorji Wangchuck National Referral Hospital, Thimphu, Bhutan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8034-3860
Dechen WangmoDepartment of Ophthalmology, Jigme Dorji Wangchuck National Referral Hospital, Thimphu, Bhutan.
Sonam PeldonClinical Services Division, Department of Clinical Services, Ministry of Health, Thimphu, Bhutan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBhutan has achieved near-universal primary health care coverage, with eye health structurally integrated into its publicly financed health system. However, the extent to which existing resources enable equitable access to refractive error (RE) services has not been systematically evaluated. This study assesses the readiness of Bhutan’s RE service infrastructure, workforce distribution, and health technology and supply systems using the WHO Refractive Error Services Assessment Tool (RESAT).

methodsA nationwide cross-sectional situational analysis was conducted between March and July 2025 using a mixed-methods design guided by the WHO RESAT framework. The assessment covered all 36 public eye-care facilities and 33 licensed optical shops across 20 districts. Data were collected through structured facility questionnaires, targeted site verification, and key-informant interviews with stakeholders. Quantitative findings were summarized using descriptive statistics and triangulated with qualitative insights through framework analysis under three RESAT components: (1) service delivery, (2) human resources for eye health (HReH), and (3) health technology and supply.

resultsData were obtained from all 36 public eye-care centres (100%) and 32 of 33 optical shops (97%) nationwide. RE services were available in 95% of districts but in only 14% of all health facilities, indicating limited primary-level integration. Optical shops operated in 65% of districts, with one-third concentrated in Thimphu, reflecting strong urban concentration. All public eye centres were equipped with essential refraction equipment; however, maintenance delays were reported due to the lack of biomedical capacity. The HReH comprised 102 professionals, of whom 89% were deployed in urban areas. Ophthalmologists and optometrists were exclusively urban-based, while only 17% of ophthalmic technicians served in rural hospitals. Optical services relied almost entirely (> 90%) on imported lenses and frames from India, with transport costs contributing to higher retail prices. Qualitative insights highlighted weak referral adherence, urban-rural inequities, and supply-chain vulnerability.

conclusionBhutan has made notable progress in integrating RE services within its universal health-care system. However, urban workforce concentration, absence of domestic optometry training, and reliance on imported optical supplies challenge equitable and sustainable service delivery. Strengthening workforce capacity, primary-level integration, and supply-chain resilience will be essential to achieving universal effective RE coverage by 2030. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.

Indexed as

Health Services AccessibilityHealth WorkforceRefractive ErrorsBhutanCross-Sectional StudiesHumansPublic Health InfrastructureSurveys and QuestionnairesBhutanHealth systemHuman resourcesInfrastructureOptical servicesRefractive errorRESAT

Identifiers

PMID41857603
PMCPMC13122856

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.