SynthesisBMC medical education2026
The efficacy of compassion and self-compassion training programs for healthcare university students: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in BMC medical education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundUniversity healthcare students are exposed to significant levels of stress. The training is highly complex as it requires academic excellence, the development of clinical competencies and strong interpersonal skills. Compassion and self-compassion are considered protective factors against stress in the healthcare context.
objectiveThe aim of this study was to analyse the effectiveness of programs aimed at cultivating compassion on the variables of self-compassion and compassion in university healthcare students.
methodsThe PubMed, CINAHL, WOS and PsycINFO databases were searched for studies with interventions based on the cultivation of compassion or self-compassion in university healthcare students. A meta-analysis was conducted using a random-effects model for the variable of self-compassion and compassion, calculating the effect size and heterogeneity of the studies. For the self-compassion variable, subgroup analyses were performed for participant characteristics, type of control group, and duration of intervention.
resultsFor the self-compassion variable, a total of 23 articles were included (N = 1552), of which 11 were used for the meta-analysis. With regard to the qualitative synthesis, most of the studies showed a significant increase in self-compassion, as well as improvements in other dimensions of the instrument used. Six studies measured compassion, two of which identified a significant increase in this variable post-intervention. The meta-analysis revealed a moderate and significant overall effect of self-compassion interventions (d = 0.52; 95% CI [0.27, 0.78]; p < 0.001), with higher post-intervention scores in experimental groups. Despite moderate heterogeneity (I2 = 60.29%) and some evidence of publication bias (Egger´s test p = 0.0273), the findings remained robust across sensitivity analysis. Regarding the compassion variable, despite the limited evidence (n = 6), a meta-analysis (n = 5) was performed. A medium effect size was obtained with marginal statistical significance (d = 0.43, 95% CI [-0.09, 0.95]; p = 0.10). This indicated that, although the trend is positive and clinically relevant, the extremely high variability (I2 = 79%) prevents a statistically conclusive statement of efficacy.
conclusionsThis is the first meta-analysis to investigate the effectiveness of interventions based on compassion/self-compassion in university healthcare students. Given that compassion and self-compassion are essential skills for future professionals, and considering the potential benefits of interventions, it is suggested that these programs be tested in undergraduate and postgraduate health education.
trial registrationThis study was registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) under CRD42024529563.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.