Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41857558›Full record

ArticleBMC palliative care2026

Family communication, death taboo, and advance directives: a cross-sectional study of institutionalized older adults in China.

Yan Tian, Wen You, Can Xu, Yuehua Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC palliative care, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Yan TianDepartment of Social Welfare and Risk Management, School of Public Affairs, Zhejiang University, Xihu District, No.866 Yuhangtang Road, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, China.
Wen YouDepartment of Public Health Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Virginia, 560 Ray C. Hunt Dr., Charlottesville, VA, 22903, USA.
Can XuDepartment of Social Welfare and Risk Management, School of Public Affairs, Zhejiang University, Xihu District, No.866 Yuhangtang Road, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, China.
Yuehua ZhangDepartment of Social Welfare and Risk Management, School of Public Affairs, Zhejiang University, Xihu District, No.866 Yuhangtang Road, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, China. zhangyuehua@zju.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0574-938X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA conceptually guided framework examining how family communication relates to advance directive completion rates among older adults may offer useful insights for improving end-of-life decision-making in aging societies. However, persistent inconsistencies across studies remain unresolved, coupled with limited mechanistic explanations.

methodThe data are derived from a field survey project conducted in August 2023, targeting older adults residing in a public elder care institution in Hangzhou, China. This project collected data from 571 participants regarding their inclination toward death taboo, attitudes toward advance directives, and decisions on advance directive formulation. Moderation modeling and marginal analysis are employed to examine the relationships among family communication, death taboo, and advance directive completion.

resultsA total of 25.09% of participants report avoiding discussions about death in family settings, while 57.27% perceive advance directives as beneficial, and 21.72% formulate a personal advance directive. Family communication is associated with an 11.44% higher probability of advance directive completion, whereas death taboo shows a significant interaction effect, with the positive association attenuated at higher levels of death taboo.

conclusionThis study suggests that higher levels of death taboo are associated with a weaker relationship between family communication and advance directive completion. We interpret this pattern cautiously within a family protectionism framework, where death taboo may reflect protective information shielding within family networks and may also be linked to a “fear-of-fear” dynamic.

Indexed as

Advance DirectivesAttitude to DeathCommunicationFamilyTabooAgedAged, 80 and overChinaCross-Sectional StudiesDecision MakingFemaleHumansInstitutionalizationMaleSurveys and QuestionnairesAdvance directivesDeath tabooEnd-of-life decisionFamily communicationFamily protectionism

Identifiers

PMID41857558
PMCPMC13123214

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.