Trial reportBMC infectious diseases2026
Multimethod analysis of adherence to preventive treatment for tuberculosis: a pragmatic randomized clinical trial.
Trial report in BMC infectious diseases, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Tuberculosis Preventive Treatment (TPT) can reduce the likelihood of active disease from 1.6% to 0.6% in contacts of infectious cases. In Brazil, four therapeutic regimens for Tuberculosis infection (TBI) are currently in use, with isoniazid (INH) being the predominant regimen. The perspective of study this study is that simplifying the regimen by reducing the number of tablets required per dose could lead to improved adherence to TPT. Therefore, in 2018, the INH 300 mg dosage (one tablet per day) was introduced to improve adherence, since previously, only the 100 mg presentation was available. The present study is a pragmatic randomized clinical trial to assess adherence to treatment with 300 mg INH versus 100 mg INH, which included volunteers aged over 18 years from February 2021 to July 2022. Adherence was measured in three ways: self-reported, treatment persistence and the medication possession ratio (MPR). The results demonstrated that the INH 300 mg group had lower dropout rates and higher adherence to treatment rates, although the difference was not statistically significant. The 300 mg INH group presented greater persistence, indicating a lower probability of abandonment. This study compared two presentations of INH for TPT: a control group, in which three 100 mg tablets were administered, and an intervention group, in which one 300 mg tablet was administered, and revealed several important trends. However, not all of them reached statistical significance. These findings may support the incorporation of new therapeutic strategies in the management of TBI, as well as improve regular follow-up by health professionals for people on TPT, with the aim of optimizing the results of control and elimination programs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.