Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41857539›Full record

Trial reportBMC infectious diseases2026

Multimethod analysis of adherence to preventive treatment for tuberculosis: a pragmatic randomized clinical trial.

Bárbara Manuella Cardoso Sodré Alves, Wildo Navegantes de Araújo, Ivan Ricardo Zimmermann, Ingrid Ferreira Metzger, Maria Christina Dos Santos Verdam, João Paulo Cola, Thiago Nascimento do Prado, Leonardo Régis Leira Pereira, Alfredo Dias de Oliveira Filho, Ethel Leonor Noia Maciel and 1 more

Abstract readPragmatic Clinical TrialRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC infectious diseases, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Bárbara Manuella Cardoso Sodré AlvesLaboratory of Evidence and Pharmaceutical Studies (LEFARUnB), Brasília, Distrito Federal, Brazil. barbaramsodre@hotmail.com.
Wildo Navegantes de AraújoPostgraduate Program in Collective Health, University of Brasília (UnB), Brasília, Distrito Federal, Brazil.
Ivan Ricardo ZimmermannLaboratory of Evidence and Pharmaceutical Studies (LEFARUnB), Brasília, Distrito Federal, Brazil.
Ingrid Ferreira MetzgerPostgraduate Program in Tropical Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Brasília (UnB), Brasília, Distrito Federal, Brazil.
Maria Christina Dos Santos VerdamLaboratory of Evidence and Pharmaceutical Studies (LEFARUnB), Brasília, Distrito Federal, Brazil.
João Paulo ColaPostgraduate Program in Collective Health, Laboratory of Epidemiology, Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo, Vitória, Espírito Santo, Brazil.
Thiago Nascimento do PradoPostgraduate Program in Collective Health, Laboratory of Epidemiology, Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo, Vitória, Espírito Santo, Brazil.
Leonardo Régis Leira PereiraRibeirão Preto School of Pharmaceutical Sciences (FCFRP), University of São Paulo (USP), Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo, Brazil.
Alfredo Dias de Oliveira FilhoFederal University of Sergipe (UFS), Sergipe, Brazil.
Ethel Leonor Noia MacielPostgraduate Program in Collective Health, Laboratory of Epidemiology, Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo, Vitória, Espírito Santo, Brazil.
Noemia Urruth Leão TavaresLaboratory of Evidence and Pharmaceutical Studies (LEFARUnB), Brasília, Distrito Federal, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tuberculosis Preventive Treatment (TPT) can reduce the likelihood of active disease from 1.6% to 0.6% in contacts of infectious cases. In Brazil, four therapeutic regimens for Tuberculosis infection (TBI) are currently in use, with isoniazid (INH) being the predominant regimen. The perspective of study this study is that simplifying the regimen by reducing the number of tablets required per dose could lead to improved adherence to TPT. Therefore, in 2018, the INH 300 mg dosage (one tablet per day) was introduced to improve adherence, since previously, only the 100 mg presentation was available. The present study is a pragmatic randomized clinical trial to assess adherence to treatment with 300 mg INH versus 100 mg INH, which included volunteers aged over 18 years from February 2021 to July 2022. Adherence was measured in three ways: self-reported, treatment persistence and the medication possession ratio (MPR). The results demonstrated that the INH 300 mg group had lower dropout rates and higher adherence to treatment rates, although the difference was not statistically significant. The 300 mg INH group presented greater persistence, indicating a lower probability of abandonment. This study compared two presentations of INH for TPT: a control group, in which three 100 mg tablets were administered, and an intervention group, in which one 300 mg tablet was administered, and revealed several important trends. However, not all of them reached statistical significance. These findings may support the incorporation of new therapeutic strategies in the management of TBI, as well as improve regular follow-up by health professionals for people on TPT, with the aim of optimizing the results of control and elimination programs.

Indexed as

Antitubercular AgentsDrug MonitoringIsoniazidMedication AdherenceTuberculosisAdherence InterventionsAdultBrazilFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedYoung AdultAntitubercular AgentsIsoniazidIsoniazidLatent tuberculosis infectionTreatment adherenceTuberculosis infectionTuberculosis preventive treatment

Identifiers

PMID41857539
PMCPMC13188415

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.