ArticleBMC public health2026
Evaluation of the relevance, acceptability, and adaptability of an existing healthy lifestyle program for people living with HIV.
Article in BMC public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionDolutegravir-based antiretroviral therapy (ART), a key component of HIV treatment in low- and middle-income countries, has been associated with weight gain and increased adiposity in people living with HIV (PLWH). This weight gain, along with fat redistribution, can elevate the risk of diabetes, hypertension, and cardiovascular disease. The South African Diabetes Prevention Program (SA-DPP) is a culturally tailored lifestyle intervention addressing nutrition, physical activity, and other risky behaviors, developed for resource-limited communities. We sought to evaluate the clinical experiences of PLWH and the acceptability and suitability of the SA-DPP intervention for this population.
methodsA qualitative study was conducted with PLWH and health staff from three primary health clinics in Cape Town (n = 35), selected through purposive sampling. The research included five focus groups and two individual interviews with PLWH, as well as five interviews (with healthcare staff (doctors, nurses (paired interview), and lay counselors; n = 6,). The discussions explored experiences regarding HIV treatment, lifestyle challenges, education, and support from clinics, and collected perspectives on the SA-DPP materials. All sessions were transcribed and thematically analyzed for insights into feasibility and acceptability.
resultsThe SA-DPP curriculum was well received by both PLWH and healthcare staff, who found the content and structure comprehensive and relevant to nutrition and exercise needs. Participants valued the practicality of the booklets, with experts noting that the information and suggested activities were accessible in terms of cost and availability. Both groups indicated the material supported healthy behavior changes, though some experts suggested further adaptation to address unique challenges faced by PLWH, such as stigma and cultural perceptions of body image.
conclusionThe SA-DPP intervention was considered acceptable and relevant for addressing key lifestyle issues among PLWH. It has potential as a resource for managing various lifestyle-related diseases in this population, though further adaptation may be needed to enhance its relevance and address specific barriers in the context of HIV care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.