ArticleBMC medicine2026
Cortical functional hierarchy disruption following subcortical stroke.
Article in BMC medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Altered temporal variability-based functional reorganization of brain networks predicts motor outcome after stroke.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundSubcortical structures are pivotal for cortico-subcortical communication, yet are highly vulnerable to stroke. Damage to these structures can produce widespread cortical dysfunction, but how subcortical stroke reshapes the macroscale hierarchical organization of cortical networks remains poorly understood. Clarifying this relationship is critical for understanding subcortical contributions to brain-wide communication and for identifying reliable neural markers of clinical outcome.
methodsWe analyzed resting-state fMRI data from two independent cohorts of patients with subcortical stroke (discovery, 55 patients, 49 controls; replication, 23 patients, 26 controls). Cortical functional organization was mapped using diffusion map embedding to derive connectivity gradients, and group differences were quantified at both global and regional levels. Gradient metrics were further compared with conventional functional connectivity strength and tested for predictive utility using multivariate ridge regression against neurological outcome measures.
resultsAcross cohorts, patients consistently exhibited compression of the principal unimodal-to-transmodal gradient, reflecting diminished hierarchical differentiation between sensory and association cortices. These alterations were stable over the first three months of recovery and spatially aligned with normative maps of dopaminergic, GABAergic, glutamatergic, serotonergic and cannabinoid systems. By contrast, conventional functional connectivity strength metrics showed poor reproducibility. Gradient features outperformed connectivity strength in predicting overall neurological severity (NIHSS scores) and generalized robustly across cohorts, although predictive power for motor-specific deficits (FMA scores) was limited.
conclusionsSubcortical stroke disrupts cortical functional hierarchy in a reproducible and neurochemically constrained manner, and this disruption serves as a robust biomarker of global neurological impairment. These findings establish cortical gradients as a mechanistically informative and clinically relevant tool for probing subcortical-cortical interactions, with potential to inform prognosis and targeted neurorehabilitation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.