ArticleCanadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique2026
An ounce of "superscreener": A novel cancer screening program targeting unattached individuals.
Article in Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
settingCancer screening enables early detection, reducing morbidity, mortality, and healthcare costs. Canada's primary care crisis has left many individuals unattached, creating barriers to cancer screening and exacerbating disparities.
interventionThe Champlain Screening Outreach (CSO) program provided cancer screening to unattached individuals and underserved populations. CSO collaborated with public health, community health centers, and community organizations to increase engagement with typically underscreened populations. A nurse practitioner superscreener conducted screening consultations, ordered tests, and followed up on results. Data from the program's inaugural year were analyzed, including participation, test completion, high-risk referrals, and abnormal findings. Sociodemographic data characterized unattached and neverscreener populations. OUTCOMES: In its first year, CSO conducted 527 consultations and facilitated 786 screening tests. High-risk referrals were significantly higher than provincial rates for colorectal (41.5% vs. 2.6%, p < 0.01) and breast cancer (27.3% vs. 1.1%, p < 0.01). Among participants, 195 (36.4%) were neverscreeners. Abnormal result rates were elevated across cancer types: cervical (5%), breast (13.1%), colon (28.1%), and lung (16.6%). FIT return rates (53.3%) were lower than the provincial average. CSO participants predominantly resided in lower-income neighborhoods with high immigrant and visible minority populations. Neverscreeners were more likely to experience neighborhood instability. IMPLICATIONS: CSO effectively improved cancer screening access for unattached individuals and reduced screening disparities. Elevated rates of abnormal findings and high-risk referrals highlighted the importance of collaboration with community organizations to reach underscreened populations and the efficacy of targeted screening assessments. CSO's outcomes demonstrate its potential as a centralized, scalable, and proactive solution to enhance cancer screening equity and mitigate the impact of the primary care crisis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41857457What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.