Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41857455›Full record

ArticleCanadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique2026

Policy recommendations for overdose response hotlines and applications as a harm reduction tool: A commentary.

William Rioux, Nathan Rider, Jeremy Weleff, Boogyung Seo, Chelsea Shover, S Monty Ghosh

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

William RiouxDepartment of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine & Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada. wjrioux@ualberta.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4278-9751
Nathan RiderDepartment of Community Health Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Jeremy WeleffDepartment of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine & Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
Boogyung SeoDepartment of Community Health Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Chelsea ShoverDivision of General Internal Medicine and Health Services Research, David Geffen School of Medicine at University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
S Monty GhoshDepartment of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine & Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.

Funding

CIHR 181006Health Canada's Substance Use and Addictions Program 2122-HQ-000021
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

settingThe ongoing drug poisoning crisis continues to cause significant mortality, with a disproportionate number of overdose deaths occurring when individuals use drugs alone. While supervised consumption sites (SCS) have proven effective in reducing overdose fatalities, their impact is limited by geographic, social, and systemic barriers. In response, overdose response technologies have emerged to expand access to life-saving interventions beyond the reach of traditional harm reduction infrastructure.

interventionOverdose response technologies (e.g., National Overdose Response Service (NORS)) and applications (e.g., Lifeguard App, UnityPhilly) offer real-time monitoring during solitary substance use. Hotlines provide peer-operated support and activate emergency responses if a caller becomes unresponsive, while apps use timers and geolocation to trigger automatic emergency services dispatch. Despite promising early outcomes, these services operate in a fragmented policy landscape without formalized regulatory guidance or implementation best practices. OUTCOMES: Preliminary data show that services like NORS have successfully prevented overdose deaths; however, published outcomes for most services remain limited. Key areas of priority for standards include the following: ensuring privacy for service, balancing data usage for quality improvement and research, building capacity to further equity of access to healthcare and harm reduction using the virtual platform, standardizing overdose response, and providing appropriate education around the efficacy of services. IMPLICATIONS: To enhance the effectiveness and sustainability of overdose response technologies, a comprehensive policy or standards framework is needed. This includes guidance on data privacy, service equity, public education, capacity-building, and outcome evaluation, laying the groundwork for safer, scalable, and more accessible overdose prevention interventions.

Indexed as

Harm reductionOpioidOverdoseOverdose response technologiesPolicy

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.