Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41857442›Full record

ReviewCurrent nutrition reports2026

An In-depth Exploration of Non-Dairy Probiotics: Demystifying Regulations, Sources, and Mechanisms.

Poornima Singh, Surabhi Pandey, Anurag Singh

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current nutrition reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Poornima Singh *Department of Food Technology, Harcourt Butler Technical University, 208002, Kanpur, India.
Surabhi Pandey *Department of Food Technology, Harcourt Butler Technical University, 208002, Kanpur, India.
Anurag SinghDepartment of Food Technology, Harcourt Butler Technical University, 208002, Kanpur, India. anurag.niftem@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewConsumer demand has shifted from energy-dense foods to balanced nutrition and functional health benefits. Probiotics, live bacteria that promote health beyond a natural diet, are used to improve gut health, boost immunity, and aid in nutrient absorption. RECENT

findingsWhile dairy products like yogurt and kefir are common probiotic sources, they may cause allergies due to lactose and cholesterol. Non-dairy alternatives, such as fruits, vegetables, grains, and legumes, offer nutrient-rich, affordable options with potential health benefits but face challenges in probiotic delivery due to factors like low pH and off-flavors. Probiotic cultures in non-dairy foods are difficult to deliver due to low pH, antinutritional and phytochemicals, excessive moisture content, and medicinal and off flavor. The increasing consumer demand for a variety of probiotic options has prompted a need for additional research and development in the field of non-dairy probiotics. This review explores non-dairy probiotics, processing issues, and recent advancements.

Indexed as

ProbioticsEdible GrainFruitHumansNutritive ValueVegetablesCerealsMechanismNon-Dairy probioticsRegulations

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.