ArticleAmbio2026
From the Gobi to the Sahel: Can China's anti-desertification model work in Africa?
Article in Ambio, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
China's assistance with Africa's Great Green Wall offers a critical test case for its eco-developmental approach to combating desertification. Unlike Western-backed conservation models, which focus primarily on ecological restoration, China's strategy-refined through its Three North Shelterbelt Program-focuses on eco-developmentalism, integrating tree planting with large-scale infrastructure, renewable energy, and livelihood transformation through a broad developmental vision. Comparing longstanding efforts in Senegal with more recent Chinese-backed partnerships in Mauritania, Ethiopia, and Nigeria, we assess the transferability of China's approach. While technologies like solar-powered irrigation and sand-fixation show promise, their implementation in Africa faces logistical and governance challenges. More fundamentally, the initiative exposes a philosophical divide: Africa's restoration-focused ambitions versus China's eco-developmental infrastructure-led model. This tension reflects broader debates about whether and how arid lands should be "restored" or "developed." We reflect on hybrid approaches that bridge these extremes, while highlighting gaps between China's technocratic solutions and African institutional realities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.