ArticleInternational journal of hematology2026
Real-world treatment patterns and clinical outcomes in patients with AML from 65 to 74 years unfit for first-line intensive chemotherapy in Japan.
Article in International journal of hematology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
22 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Venetoclax (VEN), a BCL-2 inhibitor, was approved in Japan in March 2021, for acute myeloid leukemia (AML). We retrospectively analyzed the impact of VEN approval on treatment patterns and outcomes in older AML patients aged 65-74 years unfit for intensive chemotherapy in Japan. Using the Hokkaido Leukemia Net database, we categorized 101 patients into pre-VEN (n = 46) and post-VEN (n = 55) cohorts, excluding those who had acute promyelocytic leukemia or received intensive chemotherapy. Following VEN approval, VEN + azacitidine (AZA) became the most frequently used initial regimen (56%). Despite higher rates of TP53 mutations and complex karyotypes (35.5%), VEN + AZA achieved comparable response rates (CR + CRi: 64.5%) and overall survival (OS, median 11.7 months) to r7 + 3 (CR + CRi: 64.5%, median OS: 13.1 months), and superior outcomes to cytarabine + aclarubicin + G-CSF (CAG, CR + CRi 37.5%, median OS 6.8 months) or AZA monotherapy (CR + CRi 12.5%, median OS 4.5 months). Early mortality at 60 days from diagnosis was lower with VEN + AZA (3.2%) than with reduced-dose cytarabine plus anthracycline (r7 + 3) (12.9%), CAG (26.7%), or AZA monotherapy (18.8%). Our findings demonstrate a substantial shift in real-world treatment practices following VEN approval and suggest that VEN + AZA is an effective option for older AML patients with adverse genetic features.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.