Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41857401›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of legal medicine2026

DRDarkNet: a hybrid deep feature engineering model for accurate autopsy image classification.

Kubra Yildirim, Prabal Datta Barua, Abdurrahim Turkoglu, Nazif Harun Vicdanli, Sengul Dogan, Turker Tuncer, Ilyas Somunkiran, Subrata Chakraborty, Burak Taşcı, Abdul Hafeez Baig

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of legal medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Kubra YildirimDepartment of Digital Forensics Engineering, College of Technology, Firat University, Elazig, Turkey.
Prabal Datta BaruaSchool of Business (Information System), University of Southern Queensland, Toowoomba, Australia.
Abdurrahim TurkogluDepartment of Forensic Science, Faculty of Medicine, Firat University, Elazig, Turkey.
Nazif Harun VicdanliDepartment of Forensic Science, Elazig The Council of Forensic Science, Elazig, Turkey.
Sengul DoganDepartment of Digital Forensics Engineering, College of Technology, Firat University, Elazig, Turkey. sdogan@firat.edu.tr.
Turker TuncerDepartment of Digital Forensics Engineering, College of Technology, Firat University, Elazig, Turkey.
Ilyas SomunkiranDepartment of Metallurgical and Materials Engineering, Faculty of Technology, Fırat University, Elazig, 23119, Turkey.
Subrata ChakrabortySchool of Science and Technology, Faculty of Science, Agriculture, Business and Law, University of New England, Armidale, NSW, 2351, Australia.
Burak TaşcıVocational School of Technical Sciences, Firat University, Elazig, 23119, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4490-0946
Abdul Hafeez BaigSchool of Business, University of Southern Queensland, West Street, Toowoomba, QLD, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In deaths due to injury, photographs of changes on deceased bodies are routinely taken during the forensic examination; the task of differentiating the types of fatal injury can be posed as an image classification problem. We aimed to develop a machine learning model for automated classification of the cause of injury-induced deaths based on postmortem images of external body regions. We collected a dataset comprising 4254 autopsy images of various body parts divided into six classes according to the cause of death: (i) crush (1808), (ii) choking (327), (iii) stabbing (977), (iv) gunshot (765), (v) burns (254), and (vi) drowning (127). Our model, DRDarkNet, comprised four phases: feature extraction; feature selection; classification; and information fusion. DenseNet201, ResNet50, and DarkNet53 pre-trained on the ImageNet-1 K dataset were deployed to generate six feature vectors of different lengths using the fully connected and global average pooling layers of the individual networks. Neighborhood component analysis (NCA), Chi2, and ReliefF functions were used to create 18 (= 6 × 3) selected feature vectors of identical length (512) with reduced dimensionality that contained the most discriminative features. These selected feature vectors were then fed to a support vector machine classifier to generate 18 classifier-wise outputs. Novel pruning-based iterative majority voting (PIMV) was used to aggregate the classifier-wise outputs, from which voted outputs were generated. From both classifier-wise and voted outputs, the most accurate output was automatically chosen, rendering the model self-organized. DRDarkNet outputs both classifier-wise results and voted results, attaining an excellent 96.47% overall multiclass classification accuracy.

Indexed as

Image Processing, Computer-AssistedMachine LearningAutopsyClassification AlgorithmsConvolutional Neural NetworksHumansNeural Networks, ComputerPostmortem ImagingAutopsy image classificationDeep feature engineeringPruned iterative majority voting

Identifiers

PMID41857401
PMCPMC13275597

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.