ArticleThe Psychiatric quarterly2026
Profiles of Quality of Outpatient Care Received Among Adolescents and Young Adults with Health Mental Disorders.
Article in The Psychiatric quarterly, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Addressing mental health disorders (MHDs) in youth is essential for long-term well-being in adulthood, as early unmet needs may adversely affect later functioning and quality of life. This study identified profiles of quality of care received by adolescents (12–17 years) and emerging adults (18–29 years) with MHDs, and examined associations with their socioeconomic and clinical characteristics and outcomes (emergency department use, hospitalization, quality of life). Data were drawn from representative population-based surveys in Quebec, Canada (2013–2014, 2015–2016), and linked to provincial health administrative records (1996–2017). Latent class analysis and multinomial regressions were conducted on a sample of 1,033 youths aged 12–29. Four profiles were identified: (1) Mainly men in emerging adulthood with low quality of care (27% of the sample); (2) Mainly adolescent men with high diversified and specialized MH care (14%); (3) Mainly women in emerging adulthood with high diversity, continuity, and regularity of care (25%); (4) Mainly men in emerging adulthood with high continuity of general practitioner care (34%). Profiles 1 and 4 exhibited better conditions and outcomes than Profiles 3 and 2. Despite receiving the highest diversity, continuity, and regularity of care, respondents in Profile 3 demonstrated the worst outcomes. This may be due to more complex clinical and socioeconomic conditions, including prior and severe MHDs. Targeted interventions are recommended for each profile. Enhanced service transitions for youth to adult care, coordination, outreach, and consolidated care—incorporating best practices—should be prioritized to address the unmet needs of this vulnerable population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41857378What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.