Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41857323›Full record

ArticleNeurosurgical review2026

Comparative effects of locally applied vancomycin and teicoplanin on bone formation and spinal fusion rates: an experimental study.

Cemil Burak Demirkiran, Deniz Kara, Mehmet Anil Pulatkan, Arzu Gunes, Ilknur Keskin, Bilal Sulak, Nuh Mehmet Elmadag

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Neurosurgical review, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Cemil Burak DemirkiranDepartment of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Bezmialem Vakif University Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey. drburakdemirkiran@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5016-4394
Deniz KaraDepartment of Orthopedics, Portland Shriners Children Hospital, Seattle, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9617-1992
Mehmet Anil PulatkanDepartment of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Klinikum Reutlingen am Steinberg, Reutlingen, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0005-0506-5027
Arzu GunesDepartment of Histology and Embryology, Istanbul Medipol University International School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2496-7673
Ilknur KeskinDepartment of Histology and Embryology, Istanbul Medipol University International School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7059-1884
Bilal SulakDepartment of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Bezmialem Vakif University Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0004-3862-8159
Nuh Mehmet ElmadagDepartment of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Bezmialem Vakif University Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3388-8766

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Topical antibiotics are widely used to reduce surgical site infections in spinal fusion procedures; however, their potential effects on bone healing and fusion-related outcomes remain insufficiently defined, particularly for locally applied glycopeptide antibiotics. Forty-five female Wistar rats underwent unilateral posterolateral lumbar fusion in five groups: control (no antibiotics), low-dose vancomycin (14.3 mg/kg), high-dose vancomycin (71.5 mg/kg), low-dose teicoplanin (15 mg/kg), and high-dose teicoplanin (50 mg/kg). Iliac autograft mixed with antibiotics were evaluated using micro-CT imaging, manual palpation, and histological analysis. Fusion mass volume was significantly reduced in the high-dose vancomycin group compared with the control and teicoplanin-treated groups (p < 0.05). In contrast, micro-CT–based fusion scores did not differ significantly among the groups. Histological analysis demonstrated qualitatively reduced new bone formation and less organized bone architecture in the high-dose vancomycin group, whereas both teicoplanin groups preserved bone morphology comparable to that of the control group. High-dose local vancomycin administration was associated with reduced fusion mass volume and less favorable bone morphology, without significant differences in micro-CT–based fusion scores. In contrast, both low- and high-dose teicoplanin preserved bone integrity comparable to controls, suggesting that the type and dosage of locally applied antibiotics may influence fusion mass characteristics and should be considered alongside antimicrobial efficacy in spinal fusion procedures.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsOsteogenesisSpinal FusionTeicoplaninVancomycinAnimalsFemaleLumbar VertebraeRatsRats, WistarX-Ray MicrotomographyAnti-Bacterial AgentsTeicoplaninVancomycinBone developmentSpinal fusionTeicoplaninVancomycinX-Ray microcomputed tomography

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.