ArticleNeurosurgical review2026
Comparative effects of locally applied vancomycin and teicoplanin on bone formation and spinal fusion rates: an experimental study.
Article in Neurosurgical review, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Topical antibiotics are widely used to reduce surgical site infections in spinal fusion procedures; however, their potential effects on bone healing and fusion-related outcomes remain insufficiently defined, particularly for locally applied glycopeptide antibiotics. Forty-five female Wistar rats underwent unilateral posterolateral lumbar fusion in five groups: control (no antibiotics), low-dose vancomycin (14.3 mg/kg), high-dose vancomycin (71.5 mg/kg), low-dose teicoplanin (15 mg/kg), and high-dose teicoplanin (50 mg/kg). Iliac autograft mixed with antibiotics were evaluated using micro-CT imaging, manual palpation, and histological analysis. Fusion mass volume was significantly reduced in the high-dose vancomycin group compared with the control and teicoplanin-treated groups (p < 0.05). In contrast, micro-CT–based fusion scores did not differ significantly among the groups. Histological analysis demonstrated qualitatively reduced new bone formation and less organized bone architecture in the high-dose vancomycin group, whereas both teicoplanin groups preserved bone morphology comparable to that of the control group. High-dose local vancomycin administration was associated with reduced fusion mass volume and less favorable bone morphology, without significant differences in micro-CT–based fusion scores. In contrast, both low- and high-dose teicoplanin preserved bone integrity comparable to controls, suggesting that the type and dosage of locally applied antibiotics may influence fusion mass characteristics and should be considered alongside antimicrobial efficacy in spinal fusion procedures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41857323What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.