ArticleCommunications medicine2026
Sociodemographic disparities in Hepatitis C care utilization and testing in the United States.
Article in Communications medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Sociodemographic disparities in Hepatitis C care utilization and testing in the United States.Communications medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundHepatitis C infection (HCV) is a leading cause of liver disease and mortality. Despite curative treatment options, HCV elimination remains elusive. Although the US has national screening and treatment recommendations, HCV remains under-screened and under-diagnosed. We utilized two national surveys to estimate trends in overall HCV care utilization and testing in the US.
methodsData from the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey and the National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey from 2010 to 2019 were analyzed using inverse probability weighting to generate national estimates of visits and testing. Weighted chi-square and logistic regression analyses adjusted for demographics, payor type, and time assessed the primary outcome of ambulatory care utilization and the secondary outcome of office-based hepatitis C screening.
resultsBetween 2010-2019, 23,469,344 HCV ambulatory visits are identified with higher overall adjusted visit rates for men (OR 1.54), people born 1945-1965 (OR 4.00), and insured by Medicare (OR 1.98) with increased utilization by White, privately insured patients in the office since 2016. HCV cases with Medicaid (OR 6.05) or have associated substance use disorder (SUD) (OR 3.30) are more likely to utilize the ER than office care. Screening rates are low in initial (2%) and overall (1%) primary care health visits.
conclusionsIn a nationally representative study, we find increasing rates of HCV visits, largely in White, privately insured patients seen in office. Low screening rates and disproportionate ER utilization among rural, racial/ethnic minorities, Medicaid insured, and patients with SUD highlight the importance of policy and practice guideline updates to improve identification and care linkage for HCV.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.