ArticleApplied microscopy2026
Viability classification of unstained cells in microscopic images using deep learning.
Article in Applied microscopy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In research on cells conducted in vitro, cell viability is determined using staining techniques. However, interference with subsequent observation of live cell growth limits their applicability for real-time or continuous investigation. To address this limitation, we developed a deep learning–based algorithm capable of classifying live and dead cancer cells from microscopic images without staining. In this study, microscopic images were first captured prior to staining, and then the same regions were imaged again after staining to obtain live, dead, and other cell labels using a conventional staining method. The stained images served as ground truth data for supervised training with the corresponding pre-staining images. The proposed model achieved an accuracy of 0.931 after 99 training epochs in distinguishing live and dead cells from unstained images. This framework accurately differentiated live and dead cells directly from pre-staining images, demonstrating performance comparable to conventional stained-image analysis. Moreover, the approach enabled estimation of spatial boundaries between live and dead cell populations. These results demonstrate the potential of this approach as a non-invasive technique for assessing cell viability in in vitro studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.