ArticleScientific reports2026
Environmental and microbial factors shaping SARS-CoV-2 RNA decay in wastewater: insights from batch tests and a lab-scale sewer pipeline simulator.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Wastewater-based surveillance (WBS) can provide early warning of outbreaks, but wastewater RNA signals may be underestimated due to analytical limitations and in-sewer attenuation driven by matrix conditions and conveyance. Using human coronavirus NL63 (HCoV-NL63) as a BSL-2 surrogate to characterize coronavirus RNA decay (distinct from SARS-CoV-2), we quantified loss kinetics as a function of pH (2, 5, 7, 8), temperature (20, 30 °C), microbial abundance, suspended solids (SS; 74–216 mg L− 1), and transport distance. Batch tests showed that higher microbial concentrations markedly increased decay rates: in raw wastewater at 30 °C, the first-order decay constant k reached 2.21 d− 1, whereas filtration and/or microbial suppression reduced k to 1.12–0.47 d− 1. A lab-scale sewer pipeline simulator further showed faster decay with increasing transport distance, and faster decay in wastewater than in dechlorinated tap water at 25 °C (k = 0.52 vs. 0.28 d− 1). Across the conditions evaluated, microbially mediated processes were the dominant drivers of viral RNA loss. These decay kinetics provide a basis to interpret—and, where appropriate, adjust—SARS-CoV-2 wastewater RNA measurements across diverse environmental and conveyance conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.