Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41857251›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Indian Society of Gastroenterology2026

A single test strategy using spot fecal bile acid test may be a feasible strategy for the diagnosis of bile acid malabsorption.

Shubham Mehta, Samagra Agarwal, Aditya Vikram Pachisia, Vikas Sachdev, Ankit Agarwal, Dwarakanathan Vignesh, Ashish Chauhan, Divya Madan, Bodhisattya Roy Chaudhari, Shubham Prasad and 6 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Indian Society of Gastroenterology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Shubham MehtaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Human Nutrition, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, 110 029, India.
Samagra AgarwalDepartment of Gastroenterology and Human Nutrition, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, 110 029, India.
Aditya Vikram PachisiaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Human Nutrition, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, 110 029, India.
Vikas SachdevDepartment of Gastroenterology and Human Nutrition, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, 110 029, India.
Ankit AgarwalDepartment of Gastroenterology and Human Nutrition, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, 110 029, India.
Dwarakanathan VigneshDepartment of Community Medicine, E.S.I.C Medical College and Hospital, Chennai, 600 078, India.
Ashish ChauhanDepartment of Gastroenterology, Indira Gandhi Medical College, Shimla, 171 001, India.
Divya MadanDepartment of Gastroenterology and Human Nutrition, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, 110 029, India.
Bodhisattya Roy ChaudhariDepartment of Gastroenterology and Human Nutrition, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, 110 029, India.
Shubham PrasadDepartment of Gastroenterology and Human Nutrition, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, 110 029, India.
Radhika SardaDepartment of Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, 110 029, India.
Abhinav SenguptaDepartment of Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, 110 029, India.
Mahendra Singh RajputDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amrita School of Medicine, Faridabad, 121 014, India.
Saurabh KediaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Human Nutrition, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, 110 029, India.
Vineet AhujaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Human Nutrition, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, 110 029, India.
Govind K MakhariaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Human Nutrition, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, 110 029, India. govindmakharia@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2474-2194

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBile acid malabsorption (BAM) is often missed in patients with chronic diarrhea as diagnostic tests are technically challenging and not available widely. Quantitative estimation of fecal bile acids (FBA) in a single stool sample has been reported recently for the diagnosis of BAM and may be easily applied.

methodsWe performed a pilot observational cross-sectional study to estimate the optimal FBA cut-point for the diagnosis of BAM, using the IDK

resultsOptimal cut-off point for FBA was identified at 2.8 µg/g (sensitivity = 89.5%; specificity = 92.0%; area under ROC = 0.959 [95%CI = 0.929-0.989]), with median FBA in healthy controls (1.5 [IQR = 0.7-2.2]) being significantly lower than that in patients with ileal Crohn's disease (6.0 [IQR = 4.7-8.0]; p < 0.001). Median FBA in patients with IBS-D/FD, post-cholecystectomy and those with ileal tuberculosis were 2.0 (IQR = 1-2.8), 3.4 (IQR = 1.7-5.3) and 3.0 (IQR = 2.2-4.6), respectively. Overall, 21%, 57% and 54.5% of patients with IBS-D/FD, post-cholecystectomy and ileal tuberculosis had BAM.

conclusionsWe demonstrate the feasibility of quantitative estimation of fecal bile acids in a single stool sample to diagnose BAM.

Indexed as

Bile acidELISAIdiopathic diarrheaMalabsorptionTerminal ileal disease

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.