ArticleNaunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology2026
Persistent rise in device-related errors for CGRP monoclonal antibodies: impact of the COVID-19 pandemic and post-pandemic implications.
Article in Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Self-administered calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) are essential therapies, but their safe use depends on adequate patient training. This study examined temporal shifts in the adverse event (AE) reporting profile for CGRP mAbs during and after the COVID-19 pandemic. We conducted a retrospective disproportionality analysis of the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS). Reporting odds ratios (RORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated for the CGRP mAb class across three cohorts: pre-pandemic (2019), pandemic (April 2020-April 2023), and post-pandemic (July 2023-June 2025). Significant changes were defined by non-overlapping 95% CIs. The analysis identified two divergent trends in signals of disproportionate reporting (SDR). There was a significant increase in device-related and use-error AEs, including "drug dose omission by device" (ROR increased from 10.65 to 37.67) and "accidental underdose" (ROR from 0.29 to 16.80). Notably, the SDR for "wrong technique in product usage process" showed continuous intensification across all three periods. Conversely, there was a sustained and significant decrease in reporting of well-established clinical AEs, most notably for "medication overuse headache" (ROR dropped from 56.92 to 2.91) and "constipation" (ROR from 9.86 to 1.61). Reporting patterns shifted dynamically during the pandemic. The surge in use errors suggests vulnerabilities in patient support for self-administered therapies when in-person care is limited, highlighting a critical need for pharmacist intervention and remote education. The concurrent decline in known clinical AEs may indicate shifting reporting priorities. These findings underscore the importance of contextualizing pharmacovigilance data within public health events and warrant further investigation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.