ArticleScientific reports2026
Quantitative assessment of apparent diffusion coefficient for neurological outcome prediction in status epilepticus: a pilot study.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Status epilepticus (SE) is a neurological emergency with high morbidity and mortality. Early prognostication remains challenging, particularly in intensive care settings where clinical evaluations are limited. We investigated whether the voxel-wise proportion of preserved diffusion on diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI)—defined as the percentage of brain voxels with apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values between 600 and 1300 × 10⁻⁶ mm²/s—may represent a potential imaging marker associated with clinical outcomes that warrants further validation. We retrospectively analyzed 59 patients with SE who underwent DWI and electroencephalography within 72 h of seizure onset. ADC quantification was performed using a fully automated, segmentation-free pipeline. Patients were stratified by tertiles and dichotomized using a receiver operating characteristic (ROC)-derived threshold. The primary outcome was defined as a good outcome, corresponding to no change or improvement of at least one point on the modified Rankin Scale from premorbid baseline to hospital discharge. Patients in the highest ADC tertile had significantly better outcomes (odds ratio [OR] 5.67, p = 0.024). At the optimal threshold of 0.797, preserved ADC was associated with favorable outcomes after adjustment for clinical variables (OR 6.05, p = 0.045), along with younger age and lower EEG severity. A combined clinical–ADC model achieved an area under the ROC curve of 0.868. The preserved ADC was associated with improved outcome prediction and may provide exploratory imaging information for early risk assessment in patients with SE.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.