ArticleScientific reports2026
Comprehensive evaluation of milk biomarkers as indicators of intramammary infection in dairy goats across lactation.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
We evaluated the milk biomarkers cathelicidin (Cath), haptoglobin (Hp), milk serum amyloid A (M-SAA), N-acetyl-β-D-glucosaminidase (NAGase), lysozyme (LZ), and the half-udder milk somatic cell count (H-SCC), for their potential association with intramammary infections (IMI) in dairy goats across lactation stages. Half-udder milk from 105 goats was collected during early (39 ± 13 days in milk, DIM), mid (136 ± 12 DIM), and late (269 ± 12 DIM) lactation stages and analyzed for bacteriological culture (BC), H-SCC, and potential biomarker reactivity. Predictive performance was evaluated with BC as the outcome, and Dairy Herd Improvement records provided contextual production data. Cath positivity, assessed by western blot, showed the strongest association with positive BC in early lactation and performed well also in mid-lactation. A dynamic H-SCC threshold was reliably correlated with positive BC in early and mid-lactation. Hp positivity, assessed by Western blot, was associated with BC in mid-lactation, while NAGase, assessed by enzymatic assay, showed no consistent association. M-SAA, assessed by ELISA, suffered technical limitations due to a lack of dilution linearity, and LZ, assessed by enzymatic assay, showed no association with BC. Our data suggest stage-dependent associations and support further validation of Cath, Hp, and SCC as potential components of combined diagnostic panels, particularly in early and mid-lactation. However, a semi-quantitative Western blot assessment for Cath and Hp, as well as technical limitations for M-SAA, warrant cautious interpretation and further analytical validation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.