Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41857193›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Predicting household cooking fuel choice in sub-Saharan Africa using supervised machine learning analysis of DHS data from 28 countries.

Lidetu Demoze, Angwach Abrham Asnake, Alemayehu Kasu Gebrehana, Natnael Gizachew, Gelila Yitageasu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Lidetu DemozeDepartment of Environmental and Occupational Health and Safety, Institute of Public Health, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Gondar, Gondar, Ethiopia. lidetudemoze12@gmail.com.
Angwach Abrham AsnakeDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Wolaita Sodo University, Wolaita Sodo, Ethiopia.
Alemayehu Kasu GebrehanaDepartment of Midwifery, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Salale University, Salale, Ethiopia.
Natnael GizachewSchool of Public Health, College of Health Science and Medicine, Dilla University, Dilla, Ethiopia.
Gelila YitageasuDepartment of Environmental and Occupational Health and Safety, Institute of Public Health, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Gondar, Gondar, Ethiopia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Approximately 85% of the population in sub-Saharan Africa equating to around 894 million people depend on traditional biomass fuels such as firewood, charcoal, and agricultural waste for their cooking needs. Understanding what shapes cooking fuel choice in sub-Saharan Africa is essential for supporting clean energy transitions and advancing national policies and global goals, including Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) 3, 5, 7, and 13. Therefore, this study aimed to predict the key drivers of household cooking fuel choice in sub-Saharan Africa using supervised machine learning techniques. This study analyzed the most recent Demographic and Health Survey (DHS) data collected between 2015 and 2024 from 28 sub-Saharan African countries (N = 430,811 households) to predict cooking fuel choice using supervised machine learning. The DHS employs a multi-stage, stratified cluster sampling design, and household sampling weights were applied throughout the analysis to account for unequal probabilities of selection and non-response. Seven supervised learning models -Random Forest (RF), Decision Tree (DT), Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGB), Logistic Regression (LR), AdaBoost, Naive Bayes, and Artificial Neural Networks (ANN) were trained on 80% of the data, with 20% reserved for testing. The dataset was highly imbalanced, with a 5.4:1 ratio of unclean to clean fuels, so we applied the Synthetic Minority Oversampling Technique (SMOTE) during model training to address this imbalance and implemented 10-fold cross-validation. Model performance was evaluated using accuracy, precision, recall, F1-score, and Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve (AUC-ROC) metrics. SHAP (SHapley Additive exPlanations) values were used to identify key factors influencing the predictions. This study revealed that 84.40% of households in sub-Saharan Africa relied on unclean fuels for cooking, with significant disparities across household characteristics. The XGBoost model demonstrated superior predictive performance, achieving a mean accuracy of 80.43% (95% CI: 80.17-80.67%) and a mean AUC of 0.8987 (95% CI: 0.8962- 0.9012), outperforming other machine learning algorithms. SHAP analysis identified electricity as the highest impact variable, followed by residence, TV ownership, highest education status, and wealth index. The analysis demonstrated that unclean fuels use for cooking remains highly prevalent in sub-Saharan Africa. XGBoost outperformed other models in predicting cooking fuel choice. Governments in sub-Saharan Africa should prioritize improving electricity access, reducing rural-urban disparities, expanding education, and strengthening household economic conditions to promote cleaner cooking fuels. The predictive model can help policymakers and development organizations identify populations most at risk of relying on polluting fuels, enabling targeted and cost-effective interventions such as electrification programs, clean fuel subsidies, and awareness campaigns promoting clean cooking technologies.

Indexed as

CookingFamily CharacteristicsSupervised Machine LearningAfrica South of the SaharaBoosting Machine Learning AlgorithmsClassification AlgorithmsData AnalyticsHumansLogistic ModelsPrediction AlgorithmsPredictive Learning ModelsRandom ForestCookingFuel choiceSub-Saharan AfricaSupervised machine learningUnclean fuel

Identifiers

PMID41857193
PMCPMC13139564

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.