ArticleScientific reports2026
Artificial intelligence technology for music teaching reform mode under DCNN algorithm.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The purpose of this paper is to explore the reform and innovation mode of music teaching driven by artificial intelligence (AI). By introducing the Dilated Convolutional Neural Network (DCNN) algorithm and further integrating the attention mechanism, an audio recognition model based on a Multi-Branch Fusion Network Based on Dilated Convolution and Attention Mechanism (MBFN-DCAM) is constructed to improve the accuracy and efficiency of music audio recognition. Horizontal comparison experiments show that MBFN-DCAM outperforms 6 representative state-of-the-art (SOTA) models, including Audio Spectrogram Transformer (AST) and ResNet-50, with a recognition accuracy of 95.65% ± 0.35% (p < 0.01). Validated by a randomized controlled trial (n = 60), feedback provided by the model significantly improves students’ pitch accuracy and enhances their Music Self-Efficacy Scale (MES). Furthermore, the inference latency of the model on Jetson Nano is only 82.4 ms, fully demonstrating its deployment advantages in resource-constrained environments. This paper provides an efficient, robust, and educationally effective technical approach for intelligent music teaching evaluation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.